| Literature DB >> 22291793 |
Gui-Bo Liu1, Yong-Xia Cheng, Yu-Kuan Feng, Chao-Jian Pang, Qi Li, Ying Wang, Hua Jia, Xiao-Jie Tong.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that the implantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves peripheral nerve regeneration. In this study we aimed to investigate whether adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can be used for peripheral nerve repair.Entities:
Keywords: adipose-derived stem cells; cell transplantation; peripheral nerve repair; sciatic nerve
Year: 2011 PMID: 22291793 PMCID: PMC3258787 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.24127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Figure 1Rat ADSCs exhibit properties of stem cells. Rat ADSCs were passaged 3-5 times after initial plating of the primary culture. A – under phase contrast microscope, cultured ADSCs appeared as spindle-shaped. Rat ADSCs could undergo multilineage differentiation, including osteogenesis (B) and adipogenesis (C), as visualized by staining with Alizarin Red S or Oil-Red O, respectively (light microscope, ×200)
Figure 2Walking tract analysis. A – control group. B – ADSC-treated group
Functional nerve regeneration (SFI)
| Postoperative week | Control group | ADSC-treated group |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | –97.50 ±0.12 | –96.18 ±0.57 |
| 8 | –90.70 ±0.09 | –82.82 ±0.49 |
| 12 | –86.79 ±0.4 | –80.51 ±0.09 |
Values were mean ± SD
p < 0.05 compared to control group
Electrophysiological index and conservation muscle-mass ratio of gastrocnemius and soleus muscles (n = 10)
| Group conservation | Nerve conduction velocity [m/s] | Incubation period [ms] | Peak amplitude[mm] | Muscle-mass ratio [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8.16 ±0.42 | 1.85 ±0.05 | 3.04 ±0.31 | 38.13 ±3.76 |
| ADSC-treated | 10.72 ±0.58 | 1.39 ±0.07 | 6.29 ±0.52 | 44.50 ±4.63 |
Values were mean ± SD
p < 0.05 compared to control group
Figure 3Improved nerve regeneration after ADSC graft. Semi-thin cross-sections of the distal portion of nerve graft were subjected to Toluidine blue stain 12 weeks post-surgery. A – the control, non-ADSC-laden graft group showed impaired regeneration with thin remyelinization. B – the ADSC-laden graft showed a higher density of well-myelinated nerve fibres. Scale bar = 50 µm
Regeneration of myelinated fibre (n = 6)
| Group | Myelinated fibre number [root/mm2] | Myelin sheath thickness [µm] | Myelinated fibres/total nerves [%] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1378 ±91 | 0.47 ±0.07 | 39.63 ±3.50 |
| ADSC-treated | 1671 ±122 | 0.92 ±0.09 | 50.88 ±6.08 |
Values were mean ± SD,
p < 0.05 compared to control group