| Literature DB >> 22291706 |
Gisely C Lopes1, Renata Longhini, Paulo Victor P Dos Santos, Adriano A S Araújo, Marcos Luciano Bruschi, João Carlos P de Mello.
Abstract
We report the results of a preliminary estimation of the stability of the dried extract from bark of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. ("Mutamba"), with and without added colloidal silicon dioxide (CSD). The physical and chemical properties and the compatibility of CSD in the extract were evaluated for 21 days of storage under stress conditions of temperature (45 ± 2°C) and humidity (75 ± 5%). Thermogravimetry (TG) was supplemented using selective high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for determination of stability of the characteristic constituents (chemical markers), namely, procyanidin B2 (PB2) and epicatechin (EP). The results showed that PB2 is an appropriate compound to be used as a chemical marker in the quality control of dried extracts of G. ulmifolia. The stress study showed that there was no significant difference between the two formulations. However, considering the TG data and the high temperatures involved, the results suggest that CSD increases the stability of the dried extract of G. ulmifolia.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22291706 PMCID: PMC3265066 DOI: 10.1155/2012/508945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1Chemical markers of the G. ulmifolia dried extracts.
Figure 2Typical HPLC chromatograms of stress test samples of the crude extract (CE) and the crude extract + colloidal silicon dioxide (CEA) of Guazuma ulmifolia. (a) CE at time zero; (b) CE at day 21; (c) CEA at time zero; (d) CEA at day 21.
Stability of the constituents procyanidin B2 (PB2) and epicatechin (EP) of the dried extract of Guazuma ulmifolia. Mean ± SD (RSD %).
| Days of storage | CE (mg/mg) | CEA (mg/mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB2 | EP | PB2 | EP | |
| Time zero | 0.0236 ± 4.5 (3.8) | 0.0152 ± 1.4 (1.9) | 0.0230 ± 2.7 (2.3) | 0.0144 ± 2.3 (3.2) |
| 2 | 0.0237 ± 6.0 (5.1) | 0.0154 ± 3.5 (4.5) | 0.0238 ± 1.2 (1.0) | 0.0154 ± 3.4 (4.4) |
| 7 | 0.0226 ± 5.2 (4.6) | 0.0152 ± 2.4 (3.2) | 0.0232 ± 5.1 (4.4) | 0.0152 ± 1.4 (1.9) |
| 14 | 0.0221 ± 10.5 (9.4) | 0.0147 ± 1.2 (1.7) | 0.0228 ± 4.8 (4.2) | 0.0145 ± 2.4 (3.4) |
| 21 | 0.0220 ± 9.9 (9.0) | 0.0152 ± 6.9 (9.1) | 0.0237 ± 7.8 (6.6) | 0.0170 ± 2.4 (2.8) |
Figure 3The stability of the crude extract (CE) and the crude extract + colloidal silicon dioxide (CEA) of Guazuma ulmifolia at 45°C, 75% relative humidity and 21 days.
Figure 4Influence of colloidal silicon dioxide on the dried-extract (CE and CEA) of Guazuma ulmifolia. (a) procyanidin B2 (PB2) and (b) epicatechin (EP).
Figure 5Thermogravimetry curves for the (dashed line) crude extract (CE) and (staked line) crude extract + colloidal silicon dioxide (CEA) of Guazuma ulmifolia at time zero.
Thermogravimetry parameters of the crude extract (CE) and the crude extract + colloidal silicon dioxide (CEA) of Guazuma ulmifolia.
| Sample | Mass loss (%) | Days of storage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 | 7 | 14 | 21 | ||
| CE | 1 | 3.68 | 4.44 | 4.51 | 4.85 | 4.90 |
| 2 | 9.70 | 8.44 | 8.98 | 8.38 | 8.27 | |
| 3 | 32.46 | 33.06 | 32.29 | 31.79 | 30.75 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total mass loss (%) | 45.87 | 46.22 | 46.81 | 45.45 | 44.85 | |
|
| ||||||
| CEA | 1 | 2.31 | 3.54 | 3.11 | 2.07 | 2.36 |
| 2 | 4.80 | 4.15 | 5.13 | 4.85 | 4.97 | |
| 3 | 19.79 | 19.39 | 20.89 | 18.98 | 19.21 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total mass loss (%) | 27.33 | 27.60 | 29.47 | 26.03 | 26.93 | |