BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity troponin assays are now available for clinical use. We investigated whether early measurement with such an assay is superior to a conventional assay in the evaluation of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: Patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain who did not have ST-segment elevation were prospectively recruited from November 2007 to December 2010. Patients underwent serial testing with a conventional cardiac troponin I assay. Samples were also obtained at presentation and two hours later for measurement of troponin T levels using a high-sensitivity assay. The primary outcome was diagnosis of myocardial infarction on admission; secondary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction and heart failure at one year. RESULTS: Of the 939 patients enrolled in the study, 205 (21.8%) had myocardial infarction. By two hours after presentation, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile of the general population (14 ng/L) had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%-95.0%) and a specificity of 79.7% (95% CI 78.6%-80.5%) for the diagnosis of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction. The sensitivity of the assay at presentation was 100% among patients who presented four to six hours after symptom onset. By one year, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay was found to be superior than the conventional assay in predicting death (hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.7) and heart failure (HR 27.8, 95% CI 6.6-116.4), whereas the conventional assay was superior in predicting nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.4-6.7). INTERPRETATION: The high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile was highly sensitive for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by two hours after presentation and had prognostic utility beyond that of the conventional assay. To rule out myocardial infarction, the optimal time to test a second sample using the high-sensitivity troponin T level may be four to six hours after symptom onset, but this finding needs verification in future studies before it can become routine practice.
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity troponin assays are now available for clinical use. We investigated whether early measurement with such an assay is superior to a conventional assay in the evaluation of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS:Patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain who did not have ST-segment elevation were prospectively recruited from November 2007 to December 2010. Patients underwent serial testing with a conventional cardiac troponin I assay. Samples were also obtained at presentation and two hours later for measurement of troponin T levels using a high-sensitivity assay. The primary outcome was diagnosis of myocardial infarction on admission; secondary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction and heart failure at one year. RESULTS: Of the 939 patients enrolled in the study, 205 (21.8%) had myocardial infarction. By two hours after presentation, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile of the general population (14 ng/L) had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%-95.0%) and a specificity of 79.7% (95% CI 78.6%-80.5%) for the diagnosis of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction. The sensitivity of the assay at presentation was 100% among patients who presented four to six hours after symptom onset. By one year, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay was found to be superior than the conventional assay in predicting death (hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.7) and heart failure (HR 27.8, 95% CI 6.6-116.4), whereas the conventional assay was superior in predicting nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.4-6.7). INTERPRETATION: The high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile was highly sensitive for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by two hours after presentation and had prognostic utility beyond that of the conventional assay. To rule out myocardial infarction, the optimal time to test a second sample using the high-sensitivity troponin T level may be four to six hours after symptom onset, but this finding needs verification in future studies before it can become routine practice.
Authors: C P Cannon; A Battler; R G Brindis; J L Cox; S G Ellis; N R Every; J T Flaherty; R A Harrington; H M Krumholz; M L Simoons; F J Van De Werf; W S Weintraub; K R Mitchell; S L Morrisson; R G Brindis; H V Anderson; D S Cannom; W R Chitwood; J E Cigarroa; R L Collins-Nakai; S G Ellis; R J Gibbons; F L Grover; P A Heidenreich; B K Khandheria; S B Knoebel; H L Krumholz; D J Malenka; D B Mark; C R Mckay; E R Passamani; M J Radford; R N Riner; J B Schwartz; R E Shaw; R J Shemin; D B Van Fossen; E D Verrier; M W Watkins; D R Phoubandith; T Furnelli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Judd E Hollander; Andra L Blomkalns; Gerard X Brogan; Deborah B Diercks; John M Field; J Lee Garvey; W Brian Gibler; Timothy D Henry; James W Hoekstra; Brian R Holroyd; Yuling Hong; J Douglas Kirk; Brian J O'Neil; Raymond E Jackson; Tom Aufderheide; Andra L Blomkalns; Gerard X Brogan; James Christenson; Sean Collins; Deborah B Diercks; Francis M Fesmire; J Lee Garvey; Gary B Green; Christopher J Lindsell; W Frank Peacock; Charles V Pollack; Robert Zalenski Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Derek P Chew; Constantine N Aroney; Philip E Aylward; Anne-Maree Kelly; Harvey D White; Philip A Tideman; Jill Waddell; Leva Azadi; Alison J Wilson; Leah-Anne M Ruta Journal: Heart Lung Circ Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.975
Authors: Marc Bonaca; Benjamin Scirica; Marc Sabatine; Anthony Dalby; Jindrich Spinar; Sabina A Murphy; Peter Jarolim; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard Body; Simon Carley; Garry McDowell; Allan S Jaffe; Michael France; Kennedy Cruickshank; Christopher Wibberley; Michelle Nuttall; Kevin Mackway-Jones Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martin Than; Louise Cullen; Christopher M Reid; Swee Han Lim; Sally Aldous; Michael W Ardagh; W Frank Peacock; William A Parsonage; Hiu Fai Ho; Hiu Fai Ko; Ravi R Kasliwal; Manish Bansal; Sunarya Soerianata; Dayi Hu; Rongjing Ding; Qi Hua; Kang Seok-Min; Piyamitr Sritara; Ratchanee Sae-Lee; Te-Fa Chiu; Kuang-Chau Tsai; Fang-Yeh Chu; Wei-Kung Chen; Wen-Han Chang; Dylan F Flaws; Peter M George; A Mark Richards Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-03-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Angelika Hammerer-Lercher; Thomas Ploner; Sabrina Neururer; Peter Schratzberger; Andrea Griesmacher; Otmar Pachinger; Johannes Mair Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 5.501