Literature DB >> 22289428

Flexible instruments outperform rigid instruments to place anatomic anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnels without hyperflexion.

Mark E Steiner1, L Ryan Smart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the ability of flexible instruments compared with rigid instruments to place anatomic femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions by use of both transtibial drilling and anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion.
METHODS: Rigid and flexible pins were placed in 12 matched pairs of cadaveric knees with transtibial drilling (6 pairs) and anteromedial drilling (6 pairs) at 110° of flexion. Intraosseous pin lengths, femoral exit locations, and tunnel alignment were measured.
RESULTS: Transtibial drilling with rigid pins placed relatively vertical femoral tunnels 5.8 ± 1.0 mm superior to the central anterior cruciate ligament insertion. Transtibial drilling with flexible pins placed tunnels in the center of the femoral attachment, but the tunnels were relatively close to the posterior femoral cortex, with a mean distance of 8.0 ± 5.9 mm (P < .05), compared with transtibial drilling with rigid pins. Anteromedial drilling resulted in central anatomic pin placements with rigid and flexible instruments. Tunnel lengths with flexible pins were longer (42.0 ± 7.2 mm) compared with tunnel lengths with rigid pins (32.5 ± 7.1 mm) (P < .01). Flexible pins exited farther from the posterior cortex compared with rigid pins (P < .01). In 3 of 6 knees with rigid pins, the exit point was at the posterior border of the femoral cortex. All flexible pins exited a safe distance from the posterior femoral cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: Transtibial drilling with rigid instruments did not produce anatomic femoral tunnels. Transtibial drilling with flexible pins produced anatomic tunnels, but the tunnels were close to the posterior femoral cortex. Anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion produced anatomic tunnels by use of rigid and flexible instruments, but with flexible instruments, the tunnels were longer and were farther from the posterior femoral cortex. Anteromedial drilling with flexible pins produced tunnels with good length and the best position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible instruments compared with rigid instruments can facilitate the creation of anatomic femoral tunnels by use of anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22289428     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Jidapa Wongcharoenwatana; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does flexible tunnel drilling affect the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Akere Atte; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a flexible reamer system and 70° arthroscope.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Rasmussen; Kyle P Lavery; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  In Vivo Analysis of Dynamic Graft Bending Angle in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees During Downward Running and Level Walking: Comparison of Flexible and Rigid Drills for Transportal Technique.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Vani Sundaram; Eric Thorhauer; Tom Gale; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Length of the femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction: comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Marko Kadija; Darko Milovanović; Marko Bumbaširević; Zvonko Carević; Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopović; Lazar Stijak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anteromedial Portal Reference Technique for Femoral Tunnel Depth Measurement During Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gunjar Jain; Rameshwar Datt; Asjad Mahmood; Hira Lal Nag; Arpit Sahu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  All Inside Intraepiphyseal ACL Reconstruction Using Flexible Curved Instrumentation and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in a Skeletally Immature Patient.

Authors:  Richard N Puzzitiello; Avinesh Agarwalla; Grant Garcia; Enrico M Forlenza; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 8.  Comparing the Use of Flexible and Rigid Reaming Systems Through an Anteromedial Portal for Femoral Tunnel Creation During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas E Moran; Anthony J Ignozzi; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reamer System: Technique and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Judd Fitzgerald; Paul Saluan; Dustin L Richter; Nathan Huff; Robert C Schenck
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-07-13

10.  Hyperflexion and Femoral Interference Screw Insertion in ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark E Steiner; David Wing; Kempland C Walley; Ohan Manoukian; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Stephen Okajima; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.