Literature DB >> 22289279

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy, pegaptanib sodium, and best supportive care for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration in Greece.

Kostas Athanasakis1, Vasilios Fragoulakis, Vasiliki Tsiantou, Panagiotis Masaoutis, Nikolaos Maniadakis, John Kyriopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive disease that results in loss of central vision, significant functional impairment, and a subsequent heavy socioeconomic burden. AMD treatments delay disease progression, improve patient outcomes, and reduce resource use associated with visual impairment, however, in a varying way concerning costs and effects.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost effectiveness of ranibizumab compared with verteporfin photodynamic therapy, pegaptanib sodium, and best supportive care for the treatment of AMD in Greece.
METHODS: A 6-state Markov model was constructed according to patient visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. Data on effectiveness were derived from randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcomes of ranibizumab versus alternative AMD treatments. Resource utilization reflected the Greek health care setting and was defined by a panel of experts. All treatments were administered for a 2-year period and evaluated during a 10-year time frame from a third-party payer perspective and discounted at 3.5% per annum.
RESULTS: Estimated mean 10-year direct costs of treatment in the ranibizumab arm ranged from €23,733 to €31,795 (2011 Euros), with a projected gain of 4.50 to 4.74 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or 2.97 to 4.47 vision years, depending on type of lesion. For predominantly classic lesions, the cost per QALY gained with ranibizumab was estimated at €6444/QALY (95% uncertainty interval [UI], €-30,403/QALY to €44,524/QALY), €15,344 (95% UI, €-11,433 to €53,554) and dominant relative to photodynamic therapy, best supportive care, and pegaptanib, respectively. Corresponding ratios for patients with minimally classic lesions were €24,580/QALY (95% UI, €-5580/QALY to €76,229/QALY) and €13,112/QALY (95% UI, €-3839/QALY to €37,527/QALY) for ranibizumab relative to best supportive care and pegaptanib, and for patients with occult lesions were estimated at €19,407/QALY (95% UI, €-1486 to €46,434) and €28,561/QALY (95% UI, €6143 to 73,431), respectively. Sensitivity analysis provided robust results in all cases.
CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab can be a cost-effective option for the treatment of AMD compared with selected alternatives in the Greek health care setting.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22289279     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cost-Effectiveness Models in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Issues and Challenges.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Carolyn K Hulme-Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Measurement of macular pigment optical density among healthy Chinese people and patients with early-stage age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Xue-Tao Ren; Hong Gu; Xu Han; Jun-Yan Zhang; Xue Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Jun Xu; Torkel Snellingen; Xi-Pu Liu; Ning-Li Wang; Ning-Pu Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Quality-adjusted life years in macular oedema due to age-related macular degeneration, diabetes and central retinal vein occlusion: the impact of anti-VEGF agents in a tertiary centre in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos T Voutsas; Eleni Papageorgiou; Alexandra Tantou; Vassilis A Dimitriou; Evangelia E Tsironi; Maria Kotoula
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 4.  Ranibizumab: a review of its use in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Simulation contact lenses for AMD health state utility values in NICE appraisals: a different reality.

Authors:  Thomas Butt; Michael D Crossland; Peter West; Shepley W Orr; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Patricia Marques; Jacqueline Ramke; John Cairns; Thomas Butt; Justine H Zhang; Iain Jones; Marty Jovic; Allyala Nandakumar; Hannah Faal; Hugh Taylor; Andrew Bastawrous; Tasanee Braithwaite; Serge Resnikoff; Peng T Khaw; Rupert Bourne; Iris Gordon; Kevin Frick; Matthew J Burton
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece.

Authors:  Charalampos Tzanetakos; Andreas Melidonis; Christos Verras; Georgia Kourlaba; Nikos Maniadakis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Different Strategies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in China: An Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Jin Li; Houwen Lin; Haixiang Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study of the Incidence of Major Macular Diseases That Cause Visual Impairment and Require Therapeutic Intervention in Greece: The ADVICE Study.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Karagiannis; Meropi Lygerou; Georgios Papadopoulos; Stamatina A Kabanarou; Miltiadis Aspiotis; Doukas C Dardabounis; Panagiotis G Minakakis; Sofia I Spai; Chrysanthi Koutsandrea; Panagiotis Oikonomidis; Georgia N Pantelopoulou; Olga C Kousidou; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.