Literature DB >> 22289227

Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task-specific practice in moderately impaired stroke.

Stephen J Page1, Linda Levin, Valerie Hermann, Kari Dunning, Peter Levine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare efficacy of 30-, 60-, and 120-minute repetitive task-specific practice (RTP) sessions incorporating use of an electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis (ESN) on affected upper-extremity (UE) movement.
DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Chronic stroke subjects (N=32) exhibiting moderate, stable affected UE motor deficits.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects participated in 30-, 60-, or 120-minute therapy sessions involving RTP incorporating the ESN, occurring every weekday for 8 weeks. During sessions, they wore the ESNs to enable performance of valued activities that they had identified. A fourth group participated in a 30-minute per weekday home exercise program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were evaluated using the UE section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Impairment (FM), the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Box and Block (B&B) 1 week before and 1 week after intervention.
RESULTS: After intervention, subjects in the 120-minute condition were the only ones to exhibit significant score increases on the FM (P=.0007), AMAT functional ability scale (P=.002), AMAT quality of movement scale (P=.0002), and ARAT (P=.02). They also exhibited the largest changes in time to perform AMAT tasks and in B&B score, but these changes were nonsignificant, (P=.15 and P=.10, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: One hundred and twenty minutes a day of RTP augmented by ESN use elicits the largest and most consistent UE motor changes in moderately impaired stroke subjects.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22289227     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Functional recovery following stroke: capturing changes in upper-extremity function.

Authors:  Lisa A Simpson; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Pilot Study Combining Electrical Stimulation and a Dynamic Hand Orthosis for Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Barbara M Doucet; Joni A Mettler
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr

4.  Mental practice--triggered electrical stimulation in chronic, moderate, upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Peter Levine; Valerie Hill
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

5.  Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke.

Authors:  Luciana A Mendes; Illia Ndf Lima; Tulio Souza; George C do Nascimento; Vanessa R Resqueti; Guilherme Af Fregonezi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 6.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 7.  The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Beth Clark; Jill Whitall; Gert Kwakkel; Jan Mehrholz; Sean Ewings; Jane Burridge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

Review 8.  The influence of functional electrical stimulation on hand motor recovery in stroke patients: a review.

Authors:  Fanny Quandt; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2014-08-21

9.  Ohio Modified Arm-Motor Ability Test (OMAAT): An Optimized Measure of Upper Extremity Functional Limitation in Hemiparetic Stroke.

Authors:  Andrew C Persch; Alexis Wagner; Mallory Fleming; P Cristian Gugiu; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug

Review 10.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.