Literature DB >> 22289095

Comparison of select reference management tools.

Yingting Zhang1.   

Abstract

Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool's strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools.
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22289095     DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2012.641841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q        ISSN: 0276-3869


  3 in total

1.  Open collaborative writing with Manubot.

Authors:  Daniel S Himmelstein; Vincent Rubinetti; David R Slochower; Dongbo Hu; Venkat S Malladi; Casey S Greene; Anthony Gitter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Reference management: A critical element of scientific writing.

Authors:  Arunava Kali
Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

3.  AirLab: a cloud-based platform to manage and share antibody-based single-cell research.

Authors:  Raúl Catena; Alaz Özcan; Andrea Jacobs; Stephane Chevrier; Bernd Bodenmiller
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 13.583

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.