Literature DB >> 22289012

Foundation observation of teaching project--a developmental model of peer observation of teaching.

Andrew Timothy Pattison1, Morgan Sherwood, Colin James Lumsden, Alison Gale, Maria Markides.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Peer observation of teaching is important in the development of educators. The foundation curriculum specifies teaching competencies that must be attained. We created a developmental model of peer observation of teaching to help our foundation doctors achieve these competencies and develop as educators.
METHODS: A process for peer observation was created based on key features of faculty development. The project consisted of a pre-observation meeting, the observation, a post-observation debrief, writing of reflective reports and group feedback sessions. The project was evaluated by completion of questionnaires and focus groups held with both foundation doctors and the students they taught to achieve triangulation.
RESULTS: Twenty-one foundation doctors took part. All completed reflective reports on their teaching. Participants described the process as useful in their development as educators, citing specific examples of changes to their teaching practice. Medical students rated the sessions as better or much better quality as their usual teaching. DISCUSSION: The study highlights the benefits of the project to individual foundation doctors, undergraduate medical students and faculty. It acknowledges potential anxieties involved in having teaching observed.
CONCLUSION: A structured programme of observation of teaching can deliver specific teaching competencies required by foundation doctors and provides additional benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22289012     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  6 in total

1.  Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Authors:  Macy Stockdill; Bailey Hendricks; Michael D Barnett; Marie Bakitas; Caroline N Harada
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2022-02-23

2.  Developing students' teaching through peer observation and feedback.

Authors:  Eliot L Rees; Benjamin Davies; Michael Eastwood
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-10

3.  The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jasmina Sterz; Sebastian H Höfer; Bernd Bender; Maren Janko; Farzin Adili; Miriam Ruesseler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 4.  Peer-supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review.

Authors:  Narelle Campbell; Helen Wozniak; Robyn L Philip; Raechel A Damarell
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Development and implementation of a formative instructional coaching program using the Teaching Practices Inventory within a health professions program.

Authors:  Amanda A Olsen; Kathryn A Morbitzer; Skye Zambrano; Jacqueline M Zeeman; Adam M Persky; Antonio Bush; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Effectiveness of tutor shadowing on faculty development in problem-based learning.

Authors:  Chiao-Ling Tsai; Yen-Lin Chiu; Chia-Ter Chao; Mong-Wei Lin; Chao-Chi Ho; Huey-Ling Chen; Bor-Ching Sheu; Chiun Hsu; Chih-Wei Yang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.263

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.