Literature DB >> 22288979

Shorter and proximal Timeline Followback windows are representative of longer posttreatment functioning.

Christopher J Gioia1, Linda Carter Sobell, Mark B Sobell, Edward R Simco.   

Abstract

Very little research has been conducted on what time window provides a representative picture of daily drinking. With respect to pretreatment drinking, one study that used the Timeline Followback (TLFB) with problem drinkers found that a 3-month window is generally representative of annual pretreatment drinking. The objective of the present study was to determine the shortest representative time window for reports of annual posttreatment drinking. A second objective was to determine which of two time windows, 90 days from the end of treatment or 90 days prior to the end of follow-up, was the most representative proxy for annual posttreatment drinking. TLFB reports from 467 problem drinkers who participated in a randomized controlled trial of a mail-based intervention were used in the present analysis. The results show that a 3-month posttreatment window (i.e., first 90 days after the intervention) is sufficiently representative (r = .94) of annual posttreatment drinking for problem drinkers (i.e., less severely dependent alcohol abusers). In addition, although there were no clinically significant differences in drinking behavior between the two 90-day posttreatment windows, the use of proximal windows (i.e., closer to the end of treatment) would minimize participant attrition. In addition, a 3-month versus 12-month TLFB follow-up time frame resulted in a much higher percentage of participants completing the full TLFB (89% vs. 71%). Further research is needed to determine if these findings will generalize to more severely dependent alcohol abusers. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22288979     DOI: 10.1037/a0027027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  4 in total

1.  Using Composite Scores to Summarize Adolescent Sexual Risk Behavior: Current State of the Science and Recommendations.

Authors:  David H Barker; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Daniel Gittins Stone; Larry K Brown
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-08-19

2.  Two Brief Measures of Alcohol Use Produce Different Results: AUDIT-C and Quick Drinking Screen.

Authors:  Brian Letourneau; Linda Carter Sobell; Mark B Sobell; Sangeeta Agrawal; Christopher J Gioia
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Craigslist versus print newspaper advertising for recruiting research participants for alcohol studies: Cost and participant characteristics.

Authors:  Christopher J Gioia; Linda Carter Sobell; Mark B Sobell; Sangeeta Agrawal
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Hopelessness and alcohol use: The mediating role of drinking motives and outcome expectancies.

Authors:  Laura Baines; Andrew Jones; Paul Christiansen
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2016-11-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.