CONTEXT: Current guidelines on how to divide the daily cortisol substitution dose in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) are controversial and mainly based on empirical data. OBJECTIVE: To assess how an equal dose of hydrocortisone (HC) given either four times daily or twice daily influence diurnal profiles of cortisol and ACTH, patient preferences and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DESIGN: Double blind, crossover. METHODS:Fifteen patients with PAI (six women) were included. Capsules of HC or placebo were given at 07:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 22:00 h in 4-week treatment periods: either one period with four doses (10 + 10 + 5 + 5 mg) or one period with two doses (20 + 0 + 10 + 0 mg). Diurnal profiles of cortisol and ACTH were collected, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Questionnaires were used to evaluate patient preferences and HRQoL. RESULTS: The four-dose regimen gave a higher serum cortisol before tablet intake in the morning (P = 0·027) and a higher 24-h cortisol(AUC) (P < 0·0001) compared with the two-dose period. In contrast, a lower median plasma ACTH in the morning before tablet intake (P = 0·003) and a lower 24-h ln(ACTH(AUC) ) were found during the four-dose period. The patients preferred the four-dose regimen (P = 0·03), and the HRQoL scores tended to be higher (high score indicates better HRQoL) for the four-dose period. In summary, a four-dose regimen gives increased availability of cortisol and an enhanced effect with a less elevated ACTH in the morning in comparison with a two-dose regimen but the effect on HRQoL remains inconclusive.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Current guidelines on how to divide the daily cortisol substitution dose in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) are controversial and mainly based on empirical data. OBJECTIVE: To assess how an equal dose of hydrocortisone (HC) given either four times daily or twice daily influence diurnal profiles of cortisol and ACTH, patient preferences and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DESIGN: Double blind, crossover. METHODS: Fifteen patients with PAI (six women) were included. Capsules of HC or placebo were given at 07:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 22:00 h in 4-week treatment periods: either one period with four doses (10 + 10 + 5 + 5 mg) or one period with two doses (20 + 0 + 10 + 0 mg). Diurnal profiles of cortisol and ACTH were collected, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Questionnaires were used to evaluate patient preferences and HRQoL. RESULTS: The four-dose regimen gave a higher serum cortisol before tablet intake in the morning (P = 0·027) and a higher 24-h cortisol(AUC) (P < 0·0001) compared with the two-dose period. In contrast, a lower median plasma ACTH in the morning before tablet intake (P = 0·003) and a lower 24-h ln(ACTH(AUC) ) were found during the four-dose period. The patients preferred the four-dose regimen (P = 0·03), and the HRQoL scores tended to be higher (high score indicates better HRQoL) for the four-dose period. In summary, a four-dose regimen gives increased availability of cortisol and an enhanced effect with a less elevated ACTH in the morning in comparison with a two-dose regimen but the effect on HRQoL remains inconclusive.
Authors: Chiara Graziadio; Valeria Hasenmajer; Mary A Venneri; Daniele Gianfrilli; Andrea M Isidori; Emilia Sbardella Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Mariska A M Schröder; Antonius E van Herwaarden; Paul N Span; Erica L T van den Akker; Gianni Bocca; Sabine E Hannema; Hetty J van der Kamp; Sandra W K de Kort; Christiaan F Mooij; Dina A Schott; Saartje Straetemans; Vera van Tellingen; Janiëlle A van der Velden; Fred C G J Sweep; Hedi L Claahsen-van der Grinten Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Stefan R Bornstein; Bruno Allolio; Wiebke Arlt; Andreas Barthel; Andrew Don-Wauchope; Gary D Hammer; Eystein S Husebye; Deborah P Merke; M Hassan Murad; Constantine A Stratakis; David J Torpy Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A G Nilsson; C Marelli; D Fitts; R Bergthorsdottir; P Burman; P Dahlqvist; B Ekman; B Edén Engström; T Olsson; O Ragnarsson; M Ryberg; J Wahlberg; H Lennernäs; S Skrtic; G Johannsson Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 6.664