Literature DB >> 22287919

Spigelia genuflexa (Loganiaceae), a new geocarpic species from the Atlantic forest of northeastern Bahia, Brazil.

Alex V Popovkin1, Katherine G Mathews, José Carlos Mendes Santos, M Carmen Molina, Lena Struwe.   

Abstract

A new species of Spigelia L. (Loganiaceae), Spigelia genuflexa Popovkin & Struwe, sp. n., from the Atlantic forest of northeastern Bahia, Brazil, is described, being the first reported geocarpic species in the family. During fruit maturation, the basal infructescences bend down towards the ground, depositing the fruit on the surface (and burying it in soft kinds of ground cover, e.g., moss), whereas the upper ones do so slightly but noticeably. The species is a short-lived annual apparently restricted to sandy-soil habitat of the Atlantic forest of northeastern Bahia, with variable and heterogeneous microenvironment and is known from only two restricted localities. A short review of amphi- and geocarpic species is provided. A discussion of comparative morphology within Spigelia with regards to dwarfism, indumentum, and annual habit is included. A phylogenetic parsimony and Bayesian analysis of ITS sequences from 15 Spigelia species plus 17 outgroups in Loganiaceae confirms its independent taxonomic status: on the basis of sequence similarity and phylogenetic topology it is phylogenetically distinct from all Spigelia species sequenced so far.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dwarfism; ITS; Loganiaceae; Neotropics; Spigelieae; evolution; geocarpy; phylogeny

Year:  2011        PMID: 22287919      PMCID: PMC3261033          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.6.1654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


Introduction

L. is a genus of approximately 60 species of Neotropical herbs to shrubs (Zappi 2005). It is distributed from temperate South America (about the latitude of Buenos Aires, Argentina) northward into the tropics of South America, to Central America, Mexico and the Caribbean, and into the warm-temperate southern United States. species inhabit mid-elevation to lowland areas, with at least 60% of the species found in South America. Forty-three species are distributed in Brazil, including 15 in the state of Bahia, nine of which inhabit the Atlantic forest biome (“Mata Atlântica," Zappi et al. 2010) where the new species is found. There are also centers of diversity in the grassland regions of southern Paraguay and adjacent northeastern Argentina, as well as in the Mexican central highlands and wet lowland tropics of Mexico and Central America. Although most species are geographically restricted, several are widespread from North to South America, including L., Cham. & Schltdl., and Kunth, with also naturalized in Africa and Malaysia. Morphologically, species can be recognized by their opposite or whorled leaves, one-sided cymose inflorescences, often brightly colored pentamerous flowers with usually funnelform or tubular corollas, articulated styles, and strongly bilobed capsules with persistent style and fruit bases. The new species was discovered by José Carlos Mendes Santos (a.k.a. Louro), the house help and fellow plant collector of the first author, when squatting near the latter's house. The tiny plant of no more than 3 cm in height would have been otherwise easily missed. A colony of half-dozen plants, within 5 square meters, was initially discovered. Two more colonies in the same restricted area were eventually uncovered. The habitat is an open-soil roadside, partially covered by leaf litter, at the border of a tabuleiro forest in the Atlantic forest biome of northeastern Bahia, Brazil. The species has been observed for a period of over two years, during weekly visits. This is an ephemeral rainy-season species, with plants almost completely disappearing in the dry season. While collecting at a patch of the well preserved tabuleiro forest some 10 kmPageBreak east of the first find, additional, larger specimens (10–25 cm high) were discovered in forest border leaf litter by the same collectors (Popovkin & Mendes 913). Relationships among the species of are still poorly understood. Early phylogenetic results focusing on the north-temperate species showed that there are two distinct north-temperate lineages of and that both of them have close relatives in the tropics (Gould 1997). itself is an isolated lineage and forms a monotypic tribe in the Loganiaceae (Struwe et al. 1994; Frasier 1998). We obtained DNA sequence from the new species in order to confirm its membership in and to see where it is positioned relative to other species in our working phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus.

Taxonomic Treatment

Popovkin & Struwe sp. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77114017-1 http://species-id.net/wiki/Spigelia_genuflexa Figs 1 2
Figure 1.

A–B Habit, showing inflorescences and geocarpic infructescenses, and close-up of apical part of leaf with apressed papilloid hairs C Close-up of node and internode, showing small triangular interpetiolar stipules D Flowers before and at anthesis E Close-up of flower at anthesis; note diminutive bract F Opened corolla with epipetalous stamens G Stamen inserted into corolla and introrse anther H Gynoecium inside papillose calyx, with hairy style (brush-type); older gynoecium, after style has dried and fallen off to the right I Geocarpic infructescence branch with one whole capsule (mitra-shaped, with small style remnant in center), and capsular base of the fruit that has dehisced, above it J Seed. Drawing by Bobbi Angell, based on A.V. Popovkin 602 and 602A.

Figure 2.

A Habit of mature plant B Flowers at anthesis and before opening. Note valvate and vertically folded petal lobes C Close-up of leaf with apressed papilloid hairs D Base of fruit after dehiscence (‘carpoatlas') E Fruit before dehiscence F Whole plant with roots. Scale bar = 1 cm G Infructescence showing geocarpy. Photos by Alex Popovkin.

Additional photos at Popovkin:

http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?where-taxon=Spigelia+sp.+nov.&where-lifeform=specimen_tag&rel-lifeform=ne&rel-taxon=begins+with&title_tag=Spigelia+sp.+nov.; http://bit.ly/io7bpT--2009-2011

Diagnosis.

Haec species Cham. & Schltdl. similis, sed plantis brevioribus (1.5–25.0 vs. 17–50 cm), foliis parvis (0.6–2 × 0.2–0.5 cm vs. 2–9 × 1.4–2 cm) ellipticis vel ovatis (vs. lanceolatis), corollis brevioribus (0.4–0.8 vs. ca. 1 cm), inflorescentiis paucifloribus, et infrutescentiis nutantibus in maturitatem (vs. semper erectis) differt. Similar to Cham. & Schltdl. but shorter (1.5–25 cm vs. 17–50 cm tall), with smaller leaves (0.6–2 × 0.2–0.5 cm vs. 2–9 × 1.4–2 cm) that are elliptic to ovate (vs. lanceolate), shorter corollas (0.4–0.8 cm vs. ca. 1 cm), fewer-flowered inflorescences (up to 7 flowers vs. up to 38 flowers), and infructescences bending downward at maturity (vs. staying erect).

Type.

Brazil: Bahia: Entre Rios, Fazenda Rio do Negro, Residual stands of the Atlantic Forest. Restinga-type forest of the Rio do Negro valley, ca. 15 km southeast of Entre Rios, Atlantic forest, 12°01'S, 38°02'W, 150 m, 31 July 2009, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 617 (holotype: HUEFS).

Description.

Annual herb, 1.5–25 cm tall. Roots fibrous, not very extensive. Stem branched at base, with reddish tint, with 4–6 prominent ribs decurrent from the leaf bases; interpetiolar stipules triangular, with abundant papillae on outside. Leaves opposite as well as 4 together higher up on the main branch under the inflorescence, 6–20 mm long, 2–5 mm wide, elliptic to ovate; secondary veins 4–6 pairs, arcuate, inconspicuous below and above, midrib raised below; base acute, with decurrent lamina; margin flat or slightly revolute, entire; apex obtuse; upper side with many short, PageBreakPageBreakPageBreaktransparent papilloid hairs, 0.1–0.3 mm long; lower side glabrous; petiole 1–2 mm long. Inflorescence variable, solitary (occasionally multiple), typically a one-sided cyme (rarely a simple cyme/dichasium or a single flower), unbranched, (1-)4–7-flowered, up to 28 mm long, without bracts or with 1–2 tiny bracts subtending flowers; peduncle 7–15 mm. Flowers actinomorphic, perfect, 5- (rarely 6-) merous. Calyx divided almost to base, green, persistent in fruit; lobes triangular, acuminate, 0.8–1.4 mm long, c. 0.3 mm wide, with slightly papillose margins. Corolla sympetalous, tubular, slightly widening towards mouth, 4–8 mm long, 2.5–3.0 mm wide at mouth, white with pink lobes, aestivation valvate with individual corolla lobes plicate in bud, lobes unfolded when open, closing after a short (8-hour) anthesis, later withering and deciduous; lobes triangular, 1.0–1.5 mm long, ca. 1 mm wide, erect, acute, with smooth margin. Stamens epipetalous and adnate to corolla up to middle of the tube, of equal length, included in corolla; filaments flattened; anthers 0.7–0.8 mm long, shallowly sagittate at base, truncate at apex. Ovary bicarpellate, bilocular, ovoid, ca. 0.4 mm tall, with truncate apex; style 3–6 mm long (including stigma), simple, articulated at 0.5–1.00 mm above the ovary, mostly dehiscent in fruit (except the persistent base); stigma simple, papillose, ‘brush-like' at the height of the anthers. Fruit a bilobed capsule, 1.5–2 mm tall, 2–3 mm wide; dehiscing septicidally, loculicidally and circumscissilly, leaving behind on the rachis a persistent, boat-shaped base with pointed tips (‘carpoatlas' in Fernández Casas' (2003) terminology); light brown, warty to papillose; with ca. 0.5 mm tall style remnant. Seeds brown, round, reticulate surface when dry, ca. 0.7–1 mm in diameter. A–B Habit, showing inflorescences and geocarpic infructescenses, and close-up of apical part of leaf with apressed papilloid hairs C Close-up of node and internode, showing small triangular interpetiolar stipules D Flowers before and at anthesis E Close-up of flower at anthesis; note diminutive bract F Opened corolla with epipetalous stamens G Stamen inserted into corolla and introrse anther H Gynoecium inside papillose calyx, with hairy style (brush-type); older gynoecium, after style has dried and fallen off to the right I Geocarpic infructescence branch with one whole capsule (mitra-shaped, with small style remnant in center), and capsular base of the fruit that has dehisced, above it J Seed. Drawing by Bobbi Angell, based on A.V. Popovkin 602 and 602A. A Habit of mature plant B Flowers at anthesis and before opening. Note valvate and vertically folded petal lobes C Close-up of leaf with apressed papilloid hairs D Base of fruit after dehiscence (‘carpoatlas') E Fruit before dehiscence F Whole plant with roots. Scale bar = 1 cm G Infructescence showing geocarpy. Photos by Alex Popovkin.

Distribution.

This species is known from only two localities in northeastern Bahia (Brazil), about 30 km from the Atlantic coastline.

Ecology.

The species has been found on sandy,leaf litter- or moss-covered soil areas along the border of a tabuleiro forest. The diminutive flowers appear to be able to self, based on observations of cultivated material, with one to two flowers opening at one time. The anthesis begins early in the morning and ends in the afternoon of the same day. The arrangement and morphology of stamens and pistil, with anthers located closely to the central pistil with hairy upper part (Figure 1), suggests that spatial closeness of flower parts may promote selfing, thus ensuring fruit set. Occasional tiny ant visitors have been observed entering the open flowers, though it is not entirely clear if they might be the pollinators.

Dispersal.

The geocarpy, i.e. weak geocarpy (depositors, in Hylander's [1929] terminology), of this species was initially observed on plants transplanted to a pot kept on a windowsill, allowing for daily/hourly observations. Two growth forms have been observed: one with inflorescences forming after the first three pairs of leaves are formed (usually, with a long internode between the first pair of leaves and subsequent two pairs), with the plant height at that stage of about 1 cm, and the other with inflorescences forming after four or five pairs of leaves and the plant reaching the height from 10 to 25 cm. The lower-forming inflorescences at the start of the fruit set would bend down to the soil, depositing the ripe fruit on the ground, while the higher-forming inflorescences would bend down noticeably but, because of the main stem height, wouPageBreakld be unable to touch the soil surface. Inflorescences with the fruit not set (a rare phenomenon) stay upright. Later observations of plants growing on moss-covered ground showed that the capsules are actually buried in the soft substrate (Fig. 2G).

Etymology.

The specific name refers to the sometimes repeated bending of its infructescence branches to the ground, figuratively evoking an image of the etiquette of genuflexion.

Preliminary conservation status.

The species is known from only a handful of collections from two restricted populations in a non-protected area (private land), and should therefore be assessed as Data Deficient for EOO and AOO, following IUCN (2001)'s criteria.

Phenology.

The species has been found flowering and fruiting from March to November during the local rainy season. It takes about 3–4 weeks from anthesis to fruit maturity. Living plants have not been observed from December to early March.

Specimens examined.

Brazil: Bahia: Entre Rios: Fazenda Rio do Negro, Residual stands of the Atlantic Forest. Restinga-type forest of the Rio do Negro valley, ca. 15 km southeast of Entre Rios, Atlantic forest, 12°01'S, 38°02'W, 150 m (topotypes), 3 June 2009, A.V. Popovkin 598 (HUEFS); ibid., 10 June 2009, A.V. Popovkin 602 (CHRB, NY); ibid., 15 July 2009, A.V. Popovkin 602A (CHRB, NY); ibid., 31 July 2009, A.V. Popovkin 617 (HUEFS); ibid., 27 May 2010, A.V. Popovkin 703 (HUEFS); ibid., 4 Sep 2010, A.V. Popovkin 744 (HUEFS); ibid., 18 January 2011, A.V. Popovkin 825 (HUEFS); ibid., 8 June 2011, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 885 (HUEFS). Bahia: Entre Rios: Imbé, Atlantic forest, 12°05'S, 38°W, 135 m: 1 October 2010, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 758 (HUEFS); 1 June 2011, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 878 (HUEFS); 8 June 2011, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 885 (HUEFS); 17 August 2011, A.V. Popovkin & J.C. Mendes 913 (HUEFS).

Methods

Morphological and molecular studies.

Photographs in the field and of cultivated material were made using a Panasonic DMC-ZS3 camera. Pressed and dried herbarium material of were observed, measured and photographed using a Stemi-2000 Zeiss dissecting microscope with a mounted digital Canon camera.Measurements were made using a caliper or using a graded and calibrated eye piece in a dissecting scope. Several species concepts were utilized to identify and define this particular species, which is in line with previous species concepts used in this group (Gould 1999; Gould and Jansen 1999). Overall morphology provides a unique combination of characters supporting a new species based on the traditional morphological species concept. Additionally, the phylogenetic species concept also supports the status accorded here by the species' isolated evolutionary position and its autapomorphies in the phylogenetic analyses. PageBreakSequences from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA were used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree of 15 species of , including the new species, and several outgroups. The complete methods for the phylogenetic analysis are presented in Appendix I.

Results

Complete phylogenetic results are presented in Appendix I. Thus far, we have been able to include only one other Brazilian species in the phylogenetic analysis, therefore our results are to be viewed as preliminary but having a bearing on the status of the new species. ITS sequences confirm the position of within the genus relative to multiple outgroups in Loganiaceae. The strict consensus of two most parsimonious trees is shown in Figure 3. In this tree is placed as sister to a clade containing five northern warm-temperate taxa and two tropical taxa. The only other strictly Brazilian species included in the analysis, DC., is positioned on the node just below . Below the branch with is a clade formed by the two widespread species, and , and below this a clade of three Mexican species. , a widespread species from central South America to southern Mexico, is most basal in . Figure 4 shows the results of the Bayesian analysis, which differ from the parsimony results primarily in the positions of and : from Brazil is on a basal branch outside of all other species, and is sister to a Mexican species, H. Wendl. ex Hook. In the Bayesian analysisthe position of remains unresolved, but phylogenetically distinct.
Figure 3.

Strict consensus tree derived from molecular data (ITS and coded gaps) showing phylogenetic relationships of and outgroups within Loganiaceae (tribal classification according to Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts 1980). Numbers above branches indicate % jackknife support above 50%.

Figure 4.

50% majority rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analyses. Numbers are clade posterior probability (pp) values; thickened branches indicate pp = 1.00. The genus name is abbreviated to the first letter.

Strict consensus tree derived from molecular data (ITS and coded gaps) showing phylogenetic relationships of and outgroups within Loganiaceae (tribal classification according to Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts 1980). Numbers above branches indicate % jackknife support above 50%. 50% majority rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analyses. Numbers are clade posterior probability (pp) values; thickened branches indicate pp = 1.00. The genus name is abbreviated to the first letter.

Discussion

Morphology. Morphologically, displays a mosaic of traits similar to other species, as well as several unique characteristics, including geocarpy. Its leaves are densely covered with short, simple, slightly hooked papillae-like hairs, a trait that appears to be unique within the genus. Its small, white, funnelform flowers with included stamens (vs. long-tubular or campanulate, brightly colored flowers, with exserted stamens) make it similar to (not included in the phylogeny), , (syn. Steud.), and many others. Other traits shared with the latter three species are the annual lifespan, the warty (vs. smooth) capsule and the persistent fruit base with pointed tips (vs. rounded or emarginate tips). Like , has a persistent style segment on the capsule that is short and stout (vs. long and threadlike). Like , has pedunculate inflorescences (vs. sessile). is distinctly different from other species occurring in the Atlantic coastal forest biome of Bahia, including , A.DC., Cham. & Schltdl., Mart., PageBreak Cham. & Schltdl., (in the phylogeny), Mart., Cham., and Taub. ex L.B. Sm.. Determining the definitive relationships of within will undoubtedly depend on the future inclusion of many additional species in a phylogenetic analysis. Phylogeny. Very little phylogenetic work has been published in , despite it being a relatively large genus with interesting Neotropical distribution and variable morphology linked to ecological traits, such as life span, pollination syndromes, and PageBreakweediness (but see Gould 1997). This preliminary study is limited in its taxon selection, but it includes species from five of the seven described sections (Torrey and Gray 1839, Progel 1868, Bravo 1971) and all geographical regions except the Caribbean (including North America, Mexico, Central America and South America), and is a first approximation of relationships of some major clades. The main goal with our phylogenetic analysis, however, was to place in a taxonomic neighborhood within its genus and the Loganiaceae. It is clearly supported as included in , and it is also clearly not very close to any other species we have sequenced so far, based on sequence similarity or position in the cladograms. In fact, we cannot say with any certainty where its affinities lie since it is not definitively grouped with any other species. There is low jacknife support in thePageBreak parsimony analysis for its inclusion in a clade with Chodat and more northern species. It does not group with any member of section Progel (, and ), with which it shares morphological similarities, although this section is not monophyletic in any analyses. It also does not group with the only other Brazilian species, , which is understandable, considering their quite different vegetative morphologies. Like section , sections Progel, Progel and Progel are not monophyletic in any analyses. This is not surprising, given the superficial nature of Progel's (1868) classification, based on a small number of morphological characters. Vegetative characters used by Progel, which may be highly plastic, include vestiture, stem shape and leaf venation. Floral characters he used, which may be related to pollinator selection, include corolla shape and exsertion of anthers and stigma. In the future, mapping morphological characters onto a better resolved molecular phylogeny might give some insight into character evolution in . The one infrageneric classification that holds up in all analyses is the North American section (Torr. & A. Gray) Fern. Casas, the members of which ((Torr. & A. Gray) A. DC., (Torr. & A. Gray) A. DC., A. DC.) form a strongly supported clade. According to our trees, the more tropical K.R. Gould is closely related to this group, as hypothesized earlier (Gould 1999). The sister group to is shown to be other members of tribe Spigelieae sensu Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts (1980), with strong support in the Bayesian analysis (1.00 pp). Labill. is sister to in the parsimony tree, but with less than 50% jacknife support. and L. share a clade with in the Bayesian analysis (0.86 pp), though which of the former is closer to remains unresolved. In the parsimony tree, 's position within Loganiaceae is also unresolved. Dwarfism in ephemeral annuals. Dwarfism is also seen in two other species, D.N. Gibson and Klotzsch, both of which are annuals and are characteristically shorter than other species. We have not yet been able to include either of these in the phylogenetic analysis. is known only from Chiapas, Mexico, and Guatemala, growing in generally dry habitats, including dry, deciduous forest, pine forest, and savanna. Like , it has warty-papillose capsules. grows in seasonally flooded fields and mud flats from southern lowland Mexico south to Bahia and Goiás, Brazil, and appears to flower year-round. Since the only collection of of much taller size (to 25 cm) was made in the multi-layer leaf litter of the tabuleiro forest, the dwarfism of the initially collected plants could be strongly influenced by the differences in their respective micro-habitats, with the dwarfed plants found in a rather inhospitable bare sandy soil environment, with very little leaf litter. Such size plasticity is not uncommon in plants; however, even the larger specimens of represent plants of a small stature. Geocarpy. There are several adaptive advantages of geocarpy for plants growing in variable, heterogeneous, or ephemeral environments, such as the retention of offspring in advantageous microhabitats, protection of seeds from environmental extremes, fire, PageBreakand predators. The depositor-style geocarpy, in Hylander's terminology (Hylander 1929), is also occasionally found in some species of other plant families, e.g. Begoniaceae, Brassicaceae, Campanulaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Fabaceae, Hypoxidaceae, Myrsinaceae, Ranunculaceae, Rosaceae, Scrophulariaceae (Rawitscher 1937; Agnew and Hedberg 1968–69; Van der Pijl 1982; Cheplick 1987; Bruhl 1994; Barker 2005).

Conclusion

is a new and unique species, with geocarpic fruits, the first known case of geocarpy in the Loganiaceae. It is not surprising it has not been detected earlier, given its diminutive stature and high biodiversity in the area. Northeastern Brazil contains the greatest number of known species, most of which have been little studied. To better understand the taxonomic and distributional ranges of species in Brazil, the threats to their survival, and their relationships and evolution, and last but not least, to get a better estimate of their actual number, a revision of Brazilian species is greatly needed.
Bonyunia aquaticaJF937926http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937926
Bonyunia minorJF937927http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937927
Gardneria multifloraJF937929http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937929
Gardneria ovataJF937930http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937930
Geniostoma rupestreDQ499095http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/DQ499095
Labordia kaalaeJF937931http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937931
Logania albifloraDQ358879http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/DQ358879
Mitrasacme oasenaJF937932http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937932
Mitrasacme polymorphaJF937933http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937933
Mitreola petiolataAF054635http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF054635
Neuburgia novocaledonicaJF937935http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937935
Norrisia malaccensisJF937936http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937936
Spigelia anthelmiaJF937937http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937937
Spigelia coelostylioidesAF177992http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF177992
Spigelia gentianoidesJN005877http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005877
Spigelia genuflexa JN005878http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005878
Spigelia hamellioidesJN005879http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005879
Spigelia hedyotideaAF178008http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF178008
Spigelia humboldtianaJN005881http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005881
Spigelia linarioidesJN005880http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005880
Spigelia loganioidesAF178000http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF178000
Spigelia marilandicaAF177991http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF177991
Spigelia paraguariensisJN005882http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005882
Spigelia scabrellaJN005885http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005885
Spigelia speciosaJN005884http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005884
Spigelia splendensJN005883http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JN005883
Spigelia texanaAF178006http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF178006
Strychnos aculeataJF937940http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937940
Strychnos brasiliensisJF937956http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF937956
Strychnos nux-vomicaJF938015http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF938015
Strychnos parvifoliaJF938021http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF938021
Strychnos schultesianaJF938036http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF938036
Table 1.

Material for phylogenetic analysis using ITS sequences, with voucher information, Genbank accession number, and tribal classification according to Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts (1980). Herbarium abbreviations according to Index Herbariorum.

SpeciesTribal classification Infrageneric classification of Spigelia, if applicableGenbank accession number Voucher or publication
Bonyunia aquaticaAntonieaeJF937926Berry et al. 5771 (NY)
Bonyunia minorAntonieaeJF937927Berry & Brako 5522 (NY)
Gardneria multifloraStrychneaeJF937929Ceming 9611186 (MO)
Gardneria ovataStrychneaeJF937930Klackenberg & Lundin 214 (NY)
Geniostoma rupestreLoganieaeDQ499095Wright et al. (2006)
Labordia kaalaeLoganieaeJF937931Motley 1203 (BISH)
Logania albifloraLoganieaeDQ358879Hubbard 4198 (G)
Mitrasacme oasenaSpigelieaeJF937932Forste et al. PIF24800 (NY)
Mitrasacme polymorphaSpigelieaeJF937933Anonymous 20495 (NY)
Mitreola petiolataSpigelieaeAF054635Gould 150 (TEX/LL)
Neuburgia novocaledonicaStrychneaeJF937935Struwe 1301 (NY)
Norrisia malaccensisAntonieaeJF937936Stone 14107 (HUH)
Spigelia anthelmiaSpigelieaeAnthelmiaeJF937937Worthington 21205 (NY)
Spigelia coelostylioidesSpigelieaeAF177992Gould 139 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia gentianoidesSpigelieaeJN005877Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Collection, Lake Wales Florida (living collection)
Spigelia genuflexa SpigelieaeJN005878Popovkin 602 (NY)
Spigelia hamellioidesSpigelieaeAnthelmiaeJN005879Gould 7 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia hedyotideaSpigelieaeCoelostylisAF178008Gould 103 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia humboldtianaSpigelieaeAnthelmiaeJN005881Gould 162 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia linarioidesSpigelieaeGracilesJN005880Taylor et al. 1508 (K)
Spigelia loganioidesSpigelieaeCoelostylisAF178000Goldman 433 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia marilandicaSpigelieaeGracilesAF177991Gould 163 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia paraguariensisSpigelieaeStenophyllaeJN005882Zardini & Velasquez 27462 (G)
Spigelia scabrellaSpigelieaeStenophyllaeJN005885Williams 9565 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia speciosaSpigelieaeSpeciosaeJN005884Gould 136 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia splendensSpigelieaeSpeciosaeJN005883Panero 5758 (TEX/LL)
Spigelia texanaSpigelieaeCoelostylisAF178006Gould 135 (TEX/LL)
Strychnos aculeataStrychneaeJF937940Merello 1338 (MO)
Strychnos brasiliensisStrychneaeJF937956Medri etal. 446 (NY)
Strychnos nux-vomicaStrychneaeJF938015Maxwell 90–622 (MO)
Strychnos parvifoliaStrychneaeJF938021Rodal et al. 502 (MO)
Strychnos schultesianaStrychneaeJF938036Liesner & Gonzalez 9170 (MO)
  7 in total

1.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  M P Simmons; H Ochoterena
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets.

Authors:  Kai Müller
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2005

5.  The road from Santa Rosalia: a faster tempo of evolution in tropical climates.

Authors:  Shane Wright; Jeannette Keeling; Len Gillman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The ecology of amphicarpic plants.

Authors:  G P Cheplick
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 17.712

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  On the front line of modern data-management and Open Access publishing: Two years of PhytoKeys - the fastest growing journal in plant systematics.

Authors:  W John Kress; Sandra Knapp; Pavel Stoev; Lyubomir Penev
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.