Literature DB >> 2228749

Biofeedback-produced hemispheric asymmetry of slow cortical potentials and its behavioural effects.

B Rockstroh1, T Elbert, N Birbaumer, W Lutzenberger.   

Abstract

Two studies served to examine behavioural effects of slow cortical potentials (SPs). SPs were manipulated by means of a biofeedback procedure. The ability of human subjects to alter SPs differentially between the two hemispheres--specifically over the lateral aspects of the central sulcus--was tested by providing feedback of the SP difference between C3 and C4. In Expt. I, 21 of the 45 subjects produced hemispheric asymmetries of more than 2 microV between C3 and C4 on an average after 80 trials of analogue, continuous and immediate feedback. In Expt. II, SP changes were fed back digitally at the end of each trial. Within 120 trials, 20 of the 48 subjects reached the criterion of a minimum 2-microV difference in SPs between C3 and C4 on the average. Average differentiation remained significantly below the SP differentiations achieved for continuous feedback. Trials with feedback were followed by 'task' trials without feedback, during which subjects were still requested to produce SP changes but also had to complete a task: Either sensorimotor tasks (Expt. I) or forced choice handedness tasks (Expt. II) were presented to evaluate behavioural consequences of hemispheric SP differences. In subjects achieving the required SP differentiation it affected the behavioural output in agreement with the known functions of the respective cortical area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2228749     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90069-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  10 in total

1.  Predictors of successful self control during brain-computer communication.

Authors:  N Neumann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Intermittent "real-time" fMRI feedback is superior to continuous presentation for a motor imagery task: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kevin A Johnson; Karen Hartwell; Todd LeMatty; Jeffrey Borckardt; Paul S Morgan; Koushik Govindarajan; Kathleen Brady; Mark S George
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Computing moment-to-moment BOLD activation for real-time neurofeedback.

Authors:  Oliver Hinds; Satrajit Ghosh; Todd W Thompson; Julie J Yoo; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Christina Triantafyllou; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).

Authors:  Jürgen Mellinger; Gerwin Schalk; Christoph Braun; Hubert Preissl; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Niels Birbaumer; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Improving visual perception through neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Chloe Hutton; Oliver Josephs; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Real-time fMRI in the treatment of nicotine dependence: a conceptual review and pilot studies.

Authors:  Karen J Hartwell; James J Prisciandaro; Jeffery Borckardt; Xingbao Li; Mark S George; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-05-07

Review 7.  Are treatment effects of neurofeedback training in children with ADHD related to the successful regulation of brain activity? A review on the learning of regulation of brain activity and a contribution to the discussion on specificity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Zuberer; Daniel Brandeis; Renate Drechsler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  NEUROFEEDBACK USING FUNCTIONAL SPECTROSCOPY.

Authors:  Oliver Hinds; Paul Wighton; M Dylan Tisdall; Aaron Hess; Hans Breiter; André van der Kouwe
Journal:  Int J Imaging Syst Technol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  FMRI brain-computer interface: a tool for neuroscientific research and treatment.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Andrea Caria; Ralf Veit; Tilman Gaber; Giuseppina Rota; Andrea Kuebler; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2007

10.  Connectivity-based neurofeedback: dynamic causal modeling for real-time fMRI.

Authors:  Yury Koush; Maria Joao Rosa; Fabien Robineau; Klaartje Heinen; Sebastian W Rieger; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Patrik Vuilleumier; Dimitri Van De Ville; Frank Scharnowski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.