Literature DB >> 22287330

The efficacy of hemostatic techniques in the sheep model of carotid artery injury.

Rowan Valentine1, Sam Boase, Josh Jervis-Bardy, Jay-Dee Dones Cabral, Simon Robinson, Peter-John Wormald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most dramatic complication in endonasal surgery is inadvertent injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) with massive bleeding. Nasal packing is the favored technique for control; however, this often causes complete carotid occlusion or carotid stenosis, contributing to the morbidity and mortality of the patient. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of endoscopically applied hemostatic techniques that maintain vascular flow in an animal model of carotid artery injury.
METHODS: A total of 20 sheep underwent ICA dissection/isolation followed by the placement of the artery within a modified "sinus model otorhino neuro trainer" (SIMONT) model. A standardized 4-mm carotid artery injury was created endoscopically. Randomization of sheep to receive 1 of 5 hemostatic techniques was performed (Floseal, oxidized regenerated cellulose, Chitosan gel, muscle patch, or the U-Clip anastomotic device). Specific outcome measures were time to hemostasis, duration of time mean arterial pressure (MAP) was >55 mmHg, blood loss, and survival time.
RESULTS: Muscle patch hemostasis and the U-Clip anastomotic device were significantly more effective at achieving primary hemostasis rapidly, reducing total blood loss, and increasing survival time and time MAP was >55 mmHg more than Floseal, oxidized regenerated cellulose, and Chitosan gel (p < 0.05). Additionally, all muscle patch-treated and U-Clip device-treated sheep achieved primary hemostasis and reached the endpoint of observation, while maintaining vascular patency. Floseal and oxidized regenerated cellulose failed to achieve hemostasis in any animal, with all animals exsanguinating prematurely.
CONCLUSION: In the sheep model of endoscopic ICA injury, the muscle patch and U-Clip anastomotic device significantly improved survival, reduced blood loss, and achieved primary hemostasis while maintaining vascular patency.
Copyright © 2011 American Rhinologic Society-American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22287330     DOI: 10.1002/alr.20033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  16 in total

Review 1.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 2.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Nano-hemostats and a Pilot Study of Their Use in a Large Animal Model of Major Vessel Hemorrhage in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Alistair Jukes; Jae Murphy; Sarah Vreugde; Alkis Psaltis; P J Wormald
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 4.  The surgical management of intraoperative intracranial internal carotid artery injury in open skull base surgery-a systematic review.

Authors:  Jorn Van Der Veken; Mary Simons; Michael J Mulcahy; Catherine Wurster; Marguerite Harding; Vera Van Velthoven
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Rahul K Sharma; Alexandria L Irace; Jonathan B Overdevest; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Injury to the Extrasellar Portion of the Internal Carotid Artery during Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Shinichiro Teramoto; Shigeyuki Tahara; Yasuo Murai; Shun Sato; Yujiro Hattori; Akihide Kondo; Akio Morita
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-10

7.  Endoscopic endonasal transplanum approach to the paraclinoid internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Leon T Lai; Michael K Morgan; Kornkiat Snidvongs; David C W Chin; Ray Sacks; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-06-20

8.  Endoscopic surgery of skull base chordomas.

Authors:  Neil C-W Tan; Yuresh Naidoo; Sakiko Oue; Hamish Alexander; Simon Robinson; Agadha Wickremesekera; Steve Floreani; Nick Vrodos; Steve Santoreneos; Eng Ooi; Matthew McDonald; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-08-29

9.  A Perfusion-based Human Cadaveric Model for Management of Carotid Artery Injury during Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Martin Pham; Aydemir Kale; Yvette Marquez; Jesse Winer; Brian Lee; Brianna Harris; Michael Minnetti; Joseph Carey; Steven Giannotta; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-05-02

Review 10.  Management of carotid artery injury in endonasal surgery.

Authors:  Vikram Padhye; Rowan Valentine; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.