Literature DB >> 22287296

Management and outcome of severely elevated blood pressure in primary care: a prospective observational study.

Christoph Merlo1, Klaus Bally, Peter Tschudi, Benedict Martina, Andreas Zeller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In primary care the management of patients with acute severely elevated blood pressure (BP) is challenging. The aim of the study was to evaluate the initial management and outcome of patients presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with severe high blood pressure.
METHODS: Twenty five general practitioners prospectively identified 164 patients presenting with severely elevated blood pressure (systolic BP >180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >110 mm Hg). At baseline, patients were categorised as having a hypertensive emergency, urgency or asymptomatic BP elevation. The therapeutic approach of the GPs was assessed and patient outcome at 12 month follow-up was analysed.
RESULTS: Median age of 164 patents was 71 (range 22 to 97) years, 60 (37%) were male and 107 (65%) had pre-existing hypertension. Mean baseline systolic BP was 198 ± 16 (range 145 to 255) mm Hg, mean baseline diastolic BP was 101 ± 15 (range 60 to 130). In total, 99 (60%) of patients had asymptomatic BP elevation, 50 (31%) had hypertensive urgency, and 15 (9%) had a hypertensive emergency. Only around two thirds (61%) of patients were given immediate blood pressure lowering medication (most frequently calcium antagonists). Ten patients (6%) were immediately admitted to hospital. Systolic and diastolic BP declined significantly (p <0.01) between one and six hours after study inclusion (drop of systolic and diastolic BP, 24 ± 9 and 10 ± 1, respectively) and were significantly lower (p <0.01) at three month follow-up compared to the initial measurement (drop of systolic and diastolic BP, 37 ± 6 and 14 ± 4, respectively). On average systolic BP was still above target values after three months (148 ± 21). During 12 months of follow-up patients with hypertensive emergency, hypertensive urgency, and asymptomatic BP elevation experienced a cardiovascular event in 27% vs. 6% vs. 16%, of cases respectively (p = 0.17).
CONCLUSION: The majority of 164 patients who presented with acutely and severely elevated blood pressure (BP >180 +/or >110 mm Hg) to their GPs was asymptomatic, had pre-existing hypertension and was managed in GP's office unless a hypertensive emergency was present. At three month follow-up mean systolic BP was still above target values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287296     DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  6 in total

1.  What is urgent about hypertensive urgency?

Authors:  Cian Hackett; Scott Garrison; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Can Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease in Emergency Department Setting be Anticipated?

Authors:  Irit Ayalon-Dangur; Tzippy Shochat; Shachaf Shiber; Alon Grossman
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 3.  Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies: The GEAR Project.

Authors:  Massimo Salvetti; Fabio Bertacchini; Giovanni Saccà; Maria Lorenza Muiesan
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2020-03-21

4.  Elevated blood pressure during emergency departments visit is associated with increased rate of hospitalization for heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Irit Ayalon-Dangur; Yaron Rudman; Tzippy Shochat; Shachaf Shiber; Alon Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Hospital and out-of-hospital mortality in 670 hypertensive emergencies and urgencies.

Authors:  Haythem Guiga; Clémentine Decroux; Pierre Michelet; Anderson Loundou; Dimitri Cornand; François Silhol; Bernard Vaisse; Gabrielle Sarlon-Bartoli
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency in the Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claudia L Campos; Charles T Herring; Asima N Ali; Deanna N Jones; James L Wofford; Augustus L Caine; Robert L Bloomfield; Janine Tillett; Karen S Oles
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.