Literature DB >> 22287154

Genetic testing legislation in Western Europe-a fluctuating regulatory target.

Sirpa Soini1.   

Abstract

Rapid developments of biomedical science have initiated different fora to take stand on the protection of human rights and human dignity. In front of the new genomic era with the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, a plethora of instruments addressing human genetic testing emerged, some looking suspiciously like legal acts. The notion of genetic exceptionalism was characteristic to the normative reactions in the legal acts, but it can be questioned how justified this is. Despite the critique on genetic exceptionalism, it is argued that in certain situations detection of a serious genetic anomaly may cause extra anxiety in a person tested, if the knowledge has a great significance also to family members. Regulative needs should depend on the context and purpose of the test. This review examines the legal framework governing the use of genetic tests in the clinical setting in Western Europe. Five countries have enacted genetic specific laws, and three have comprehensive provisions pertaining genetic testing in their biomedical legislation. Central provisions cover informed consent, autonomy and integrity of the person tested, further uses of tests results, quality requirements of the personnel and facilities involved. Moreover, contemporary challenges related to whole genome sequencing, direct-to-consumer genetic tests and insurance are briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287154      PMCID: PMC3312949          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0078-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  14 in total

1.  Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J G Hodge
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1999

2.  Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms.

Authors:  Stephanie L. Anderson
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  2004

3.  Some considerations about a report on 'Public health in an era of genomic-based and personalized medicine' from the Public Health Foundation, Cambridge.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Cassiman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-02-19

4.  The Babel of genetic data terminology.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Madelaine Saginur
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Genetic horoscopes: is it all in the genes? Points for regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Christine Patch; Jorge Sequeiros; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Conceptual quandaries about genetic data--a comparative perspective.

Authors:  Atina Krajewska
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2009-03

7.  Patenting and licensing in genetic testing: ethical, legal, and social issues.

Authors:  Sirpa Soini; Ségolène Aymé; Gert Matthijs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Individual genomes on the horizon.

Authors:  Richard P Lifton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Genomics, health care, and society.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  17 in total

1.  Editorial: genetics and democracy.

Authors:  Maria Hedlund; Niclas Hagen; Ulf Kristoffersson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Different concepts and models of information for family-relevant genetic findings: comparison and ethical analysis.

Authors:  Christian Lenk; Debora Frommeld
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

3.  Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling de Paor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Disclosure of research results in genetic studies of Parkinson's disease caused by LRRK2 mutations.

Authors:  Claustre Pont-Sunyer; Susan Bressman; Deborah Raymond; Amanda Glickman; Eduardo Tolosa; Rachel Saunders-Pullman
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 5.  Informing relatives of their genetic risk: an examination of the Belgian legal context.

Authors:  Amicia Phillips; Thomas Bronselaer; Pascal Borry; Ine Van Hoyweghen; Danya F Vears; Laurent Pasquier; Stefaan Callens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 6.  Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers.

Authors:  Cody Brannan; Alexandra L Foulkes; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Slovenia: availability, ethical dilemmas and legislation.

Authors:  Irena Vrecar; Borut Peterlin; Natasa Teran; Luca Lovrecic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  Communicating BRCA research results to patients enrolled in international clinical trials: lessons learnt from the AGO-OVAR 16 study.

Authors:  David J Pulford; Philipp Harter; Anne Floquet; Catherine Barrett; Dong Hoon Suh; Michael Friedlander; José Angel Arranz; Kosei Hasegawa; Hiroomi Tada; Peter Vuylsteke; Mansoor R Mirza; Nicoletta Donadello; Giovanni Scambia; Toby Johnson; Charles Cox; John K Chan; Martin Imhof; Thomas J Herzog; Paula Calvert; Pauline Wimberger; Dominique Berton-Rigaud; Myong Cheol Lim; Gabriele Elser; Chun-Fang Xu; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 Consortium: geographical differences in returning genetic research data to study participants.

Authors:  Roy N Alcalay; Jan Aasly; Daniela Berg; Susan Bressman; Alexis Brice; Kathrin Brockmann; Piu Chan; Lorraine Clark; Florence Cormier; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Alexandra Durr; Maurizio Facheris; Matthew Farrer; Tatiana M Foroud; Thomas Gasser; Nir Giladi; Cheryl Halter; Anthony Lang; J William Langston; Connie Marras; Jose-Felix Marti-Masso; Javier Ruiz Martinez; Helen Mejia-Santana; Anat Mirelman; Claustre Pont-Sunyer; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Deborah Raymond; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Birgitt Schüle; Caroline Tanner; Eduardo Tolosa; Alison Urkowitz; Dolores Vilas; Adina Wise; Karen Marder
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Clinicians' attitude towards family planning and timing of diagnosis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Stéphanie De Rechter; Jonathan Kringen; Peter Janssens; Max Christoph Liebau; Koenraad Devriendt; Elena Levtchenko; Carsten Bergmann; François Jouret; Bert Bammens; Pascal Borry; Franz Schaefer; Djalila Mekahli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.