Literature DB >> 22287066

The relationship between breast size and anthropometric characteristics.

Nicola Brown1, Jennifer White, Alexandra Milligan, Debbie Risius, Bessie Ayres, Wendy Hedger, Joanna Scurr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current clinical selection criteria for mammaplasty use weight-related parameters, and weight loss is recommended as a nonsurgical intervention to reduce breast size. However, research has not firmly established if breast size is related to body size and composition. This study aims to investigate anthropometric characteristics in smaller and larger breasted women and identify predictors of breast mass.
METHODS: A bra fitter determined underband and cup size of 93 A to H cup size women (mean ± standard deviation, age 25.7 ± 5.6 years, height 1.67 ± 0.6 cm, and mass 65.6 ± 11.0 kg). Estimations of breast mass (g) were made, and participants were categorized as smaller (<500 g) or larger (>500 g) breasted. Restricted anthropometric profiles determined body mass, height, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, sum of eight skinfolds, subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio, somatotype, percent body fat, fat and fat-free mass, and suprasternal notch to nipple distance.
RESULTS: All variables (excluding height, subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio, and age) were significantly greater in larger breasted women. Body mass-related parameters and suprasternal notch to nipple distance were positively related to breast mass, with BMI and suprasternal notch to nipple distance accounting for half of the variance in breast mass.
CONCLUSION: Smaller and larger breasted women demonstrate differences in anthropometry, with body mass and BMI demonstrating strong relationships to breast mass. Measures of BMI and suprasternal notch to nipple distance enable predictions of breast mass and suggest that weight-related parameters are not appropriate exclusion criteria for mammaplasty.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287066     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  10 in total

1.  The Occurrence, Causes and Perceived Performance Effects of Breast Injuries in Elite Female Athletes.

Authors:  Brooke R Brisbine; Julie R Steele; Elissa J Phillips; Deirdre E McGhee
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Collaborating with mammographers to address their work-related musculoskeletal discomfort.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sommerich; Steven A Lavender; Kevin D Evans; Elizabeth Sanders; Sharon Joines; Sabrina Lamar; Radin Zaid Radin Umar; Wei-Ting Yen; SangHyun Park
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Collaborating with cardiac sonographers to develop work-related musculoskeletal disorder interventions.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sommerich; Steven A Lavender; Kevin Evans; Elizabeth Sanders; Sharon Joines; Sabrina Lamar; Radin Zaid Radin Umar; Wei-Ting Yen; Jing Li; Shasank Nagavarapu; Jennifer A Dickerson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The genetic interplay between body mass index, breast size and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Authors:  Brandon Nick Sern Ooi; Huiwen Loh; Peh Joo Ho; Roger L Milne; Graham Giles; Chi Gao; Peter Kraft; Esther M John; Anthony Swerdlow; Hermann Brenner; Anna H Wu; Christopher Haiman; D Gareth Evans; Wei Zheng; Peter A Fasching; Jose Esteban Castelao; Ava Kwong; Xia Shen; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Alison Dunning; Douglas Easton; Mikael Hartman; Jingmei Li
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Stereotypical and Actual Associations of Breast Size with Mating-Relevant Traits.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński; Rafał Makarewicz; Zbigniew Bartoszewicz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-27

6.  Resource security impacts men's female breast size preferences.

Authors:  Viren Swami; Martin J Tovée
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of breast hypertrophy on patient posture.

Authors:  Oren Lapid; E Joline de Groof; Leonard Umc Corion; Mark Jc Smeulders; Chantal Mam van der Horst
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

8.  Environmental and lifestyle risk factors of breast cancer in Malta-a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  John Paul Cauchi; Liberato Camilleri; Christian Scerri
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 9.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

10.  Effects of obesity on breast size, thoracic spine structure and function, upper torso musculoskeletal pain and physical activity in women.

Authors:  Julie R Steele; Celeste E Coltman; Deirdre E McGhee
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 7.179

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.