Literature DB >> 22287035

Low frequency oscillations of response time explain parent ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity.

María Ángeles Mairena1, Adriana Di Martino, Cristina Domínguez-Martín, Lorena Gómez-Guerrero, Gerard Gioia, Eva Petkova, F Xavier Castellanos.   

Abstract

Greater intra-subject variability (ISV) in response time is a heritable endophenotype of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Spontaneous low frequency oscillations (LFO: 0.01-0.1 Hz) observed in brain functional magnetic resonance signals might account for such behavioral variability. Recently, we demonstrated that ISV in response time (RT) explained ratings of ADHD symptoms. Building on this finding, here we hypothesized that LFO in RT time series would explain these ratings, both independently and in addition to RT coefficient of variation (CV). To measure RT LFO, we applied Morlet wavelet transform to the previously collected RT data. Our community sample consisted of 98 children (including 66 boys, mean age 9.9 ± 1.4 years), who completed four computer Tasks of Executive Control. Conners' Parent Rating Scale ratings were obtained. RT LFO of three tasks significantly explained ratings of inattention, hyperactivity and three global Conners' subscales. In addition, RT LFO during two tasks that included an inhibitory component increased the proportions of variance explained in subscales of both inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, beyond the effects of RT-CV. Three specific low frequency bands (Slow-5: 0.01-0.027 Hz; Slow-4: 0.027-0.073 Hz; Slow-3: 0.073-0.20 Hz) were strongly related to the ADHD scales. We conclude that RT LFO predict dimensional ratings of ADHD symptoms both independently and in addition to RTCV. Results suggest that frequency analyses are a suitable methodology to link behavioral responses to putative underlying physiological processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287035      PMCID: PMC3821733          DOI: 10.1007/s00787-011-0237-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  25 in total

1.  Psychological mechanisms in hyperactivity: II. The role of genetic factors.

Authors:  J Kuntsi; J Stevenson
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  A default mode of brain function.

Authors:  M E Raichle; A M MacLeod; A Z Snyder; W J Powers; D A Gusnard; G L Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes.

Authors:  F Xavier Castellanos; Rosemary Tannock
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability.

Authors:  A M Clare Kelly; Lucina Q Uddin; Bharat B Biswal; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a category or a continuum? Genetic analysis of a large-scale twin study.

Authors:  F Levy; D A Hay; M McStephen; C Wood; I Waldman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Response-time variability is related to parent ratings of inattention, hyperactivity, and executive function.

Authors:  Lorena Gómez-Guerrero; Cristina Domínguez Martín; María Angeles Mairena; Adriana Di Martino; Jing Wang; Alan L Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Peter K Isquith; Gerard Gioia; Eva Petkova; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.256

7.  Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach.

Authors:  C Leth-Steensen; Z K Elbaz; V I Douglas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-05

8.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI.

Authors:  B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; V M Haughton; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  SNPs in dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) and norepinephrine transporter gene (NET) are associated with continuous performance task (CPT) phenotypes in ADHD children and their families.

Authors:  S H Kollins; A D Anastopoulos; A M Lachiewicz; D FitzGerald; E Morrissey-Kane; M E Garrett; S L Keatts; A E Ashley-Koch
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.568

10.  Speed, variability, and timing of motor output in ADHD: which measures are useful for endophenotypic research?

Authors:  Nanda N J Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Jaap Oosterlaan; Leo Beem; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Jan Buitelaar; Joseph A Sergeant
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  3 in total

1.  Response time intra-subject variability: commonalities between children with autism spectrum disorders and children with ADHD.

Authors:  Nicoletta Adamo; Lan Huo; Samantha Adelsberg; Eva Petkova; F Xavier Castellanos; Adriana Di Martino
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Response Time Variability During a Sustained Attention Task.

Authors:  Keitaro Machida; Michael Murias; Katherine A Johnson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Source localized infraslow neurofeedback training in people with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled feasibility clinical trial.

Authors:  Jerin Mathew; Divya Bharatkumar Adhia; Mark Llewellyn Smith; Dirk De Ridder; Ramakrishnan Mani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.