Literature DB >> 22286412

The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.

Stefan J Cano1, Anne F Klassen, Amie M Scott, Peter G Cordeiro, Andrea L Pusic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q is a new patient-reported outcome instrument for cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. For it to be used appropriately in clinical research, it is important that its validity is demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test this property.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the BREAST-Q subscales by using Rasch measurement methods and traditional psychometric methods with a focus on construct validity (including comparisons with existing breast-related, patient-reported outcome measures) and clinical validity (including hypothesis-driven questions with clinical subsamples).
RESULTS: A total of 817 women returned completed questionnaires (corrected response rate, 66 percent). Validity was supported by three Rasch analysis findings: the number of item response options was found to be appropriate (thresholds were ordered correctly); item locations in each subscale were spread out (range of logit span, 0.7 to 6.6), indicating that each subscale captures a wide range of issues; and fit to the Rasch model was good. Overall, scale reliability was supported by high Person separation indices (≥0.73). Traditional psychometric scale validity was supported by interscale correlations, comparisons of scores generated from clinically defined subgroups, and correlations with sociodemographic variables. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's alpha coefficients (>0.80), item-total correlations (range of means, 0.58 to 0.87), and intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.80).
CONCLUSIONS: This study further supports the BREAST-Q as a useful tool to study the impact and effectiveness of breast surgery from the patients' perspective. It can be used as the initial building blocks toward establishing the clinical meaning of BREAST-Q scale scores, further supporting an evidence-based approach to surgical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22286412     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  69 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Michael A Howard; Mark Sisco; Katharine Yao; David J Winchester; Ermilo Barrera; Jeremy Warner; Jennifer Jaffe; Peter Hulick; Kristine Kuchta; Andrea L Pusic; Stephen F Sener
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Impact of Unilateral versus Bilateral Breast Reconstruction on Procedure Choices and Outcomes.

Authors:  Erin M Taylor; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Billig; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Neil Fine; Edward Buchel; Gayle M Gordillo; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Claudia Albornoz; Anne F Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Toni Zhong; Katie Weichman; Michael Papsdorf; Peter A Lennox; Alexes Hazen; Evan Matros; Joseph Disa; Babak Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Racial and ethnic variations in one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas L Berlin; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Introducing BREAST-Q Computerized Adaptive Testing: Short and Individualized Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment following Reconstructive Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Danny A Young-Afat; Christopher Gibbons; Anne F Klassen; Andrew J Vickers; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.