Literature DB >> 22286314

Dose-dependent change in biomarkers during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with fulvestrant: results from NEWEST, a randomized Phase II study.

Irene Kuter1, Julia M W Gee, Roberto Hegg, Christian F Singer, Rajendra A Badwe, Elizabeth S Lowe, Ugochi A Emeribe, Elizabeth Anderson, Francisco Sapunar, Pauline Finlay, Robert I Nicholson, José Bines, Nadia Harbeck.   

Abstract

NEWEST (Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Estrogen-Sensitive Tumors) is the first study to compare biological and clinical activity of fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in the neoadjuvant breast cancer setting. We hypothesized that fulvestrant 500 mg may be superior to 250 mg in blocking estrogen receptor (ER) signaling and growth. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase II study was performed to compare fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg/month plus 500 mg on day 14 of month 1) versus fulvestrant 250 mg/month for 16 weeks prior to surgery in postmenopausal women with ER+ locally advanced breast cancer. Core biopsies at baseline, week 4, and surgery were assessed for biomarker changes. Primary endpoint: change in Ki67 labeling index (LI) from baseline to week 4 determined by automated computer imaging system (ACIS). Secondary endpoints: ER protein expression and function; progesterone receptor (PgR) expression; tumor response; tolerability. ER and PgR were examined retrospectively using the H score method. A total of 211 patients were randomized (fulvestrant 500 mg: n = 109; 250 mg: n = 102). At week 4, fulvestrant 500 mg resulted in greater reduction of Ki67 LI and ER expression versus 250 mg (-78.8 vs. -47.4% [p < 0.0001] and -25.0 vs. -13.5% [p = 0.0002], respectively [ACIS]); PgR suppression was not significantly different (-22.7 vs. -17.6; p = 0.5677). However, H score detected even greater suppression of ER (-50.3 vs. -13.7%; p < 0.0001) and greater PgR suppression (-80.5 vs. -46.3%; p = 0.0018) for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg. At week 16, tumor response rates were 22.9 and 20.6% for fulvestrant 500 and 250 mg, respectively, with considerable decline in all markers by both ACIS and H score. No detrimental effects on endometrial thickness or bone markers and no new safety concerns were identified. This provides the first evidence of greater biological activity for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in depleting ER expression, function, and growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22286314     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1947-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  29 in total

Review 1.  Reliable Biomarkers to Identify New and Recurrent Cancer.

Authors:  Edward R Sauter
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-10-01

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A potential strategy for ER-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Li-Tong Yao; Mo-Zhi Wang; Meng-Shen Wang; Xue-Ting Yu; Jing-Yi Guo; Tie Sun; Xin-Yan Li; Ying-Ying Xu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  The selective estrogen receptor downregulator GDC-0810 is efficacious in diverse models of ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  James D Joseph; Beatrice Darimont; Wei Zhou; Alfonso Arrazate; Amy Young; Ellen Ingalla; Kimberly Walter; Robert A Blake; Jim Nonomiya; Zhengyu Guan; Lorna Kategaya; Steven P Govek; Andiliy G Lai; Mehmet Kahraman; Dan Brigham; John Sensintaffar; Nhin Lu; Gang Shao; Jing Qian; Kate Grillot; Michael Moon; Rene Prudente; Eric Bischoff; Kyoung-Jin Lee; Celine Bonnefous; Karensa L Douglas; Jackaline D Julien; Johnny Y Nagasawa; Anna Aparicio; Josh Kaufman; Benjamin Haley; Jennifer M Giltnane; Ingrid E Wertz; Mark R Lackner; Michelle A Nannini; Deepak Sampath; Luis Schwarz; Henry Charles Manning; Mohammed Noor Tantawy; Carlos L Arteaga; Richard A Heyman; Peter J Rix; Lori Friedman; Nicholas D Smith; Ciara Metcalfe; Jeffrey H Hager
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Fulvestrant: A Review in Advanced Breast Cancer Not Previously Treated with Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Trials in ER+ Breast Cancer: A Tool for Acceleration of Drug Development and Discovery.

Authors:  Angel L Guerrero-Zotano; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Pharmacodynamic imaging guides dosing of a selective estrogen receptor degrader.

Authors:  Pedram Heidari; Francis Deng; Shadi A Esfahani; Alicia K Leece; Timothy M Shoup; Neil Vasdev; Umar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Current medical treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Franco Lumachi; Davide A Santeufemia; Stefano Mm Basso
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26

8.  Targeting Estrogen Receptor Signaling with Fulvestrant Enhances Immune and Chemotherapy-Mediated Cytotoxicity of Human Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Duane H Hamilton; Lesley Mathews Griner; Jonathan M Keller; Xin Hu; Noel Southall; Juan Marugan; Justin M David; Marc Ferrer; Claudia Palena
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Optimal management of hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer in 2016.

Authors:  Tomas Reinert; Carlos H Barrios
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 8.168

10.  ACT-FASTER, a Prospective Cohort Study Exploring Treatment Patterns with Fulvestrant and Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer under Real-Life Conditions in Germany.

Authors:  Nicolai Maass; Helmut Ostermann; Kurt Possinger; Peter Klein; Hans Tesch; Lars Mühlenhoff; Dirk Bauerschlag
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.