BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) are major causes of morbidity in infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical procedures applied, and the survival and long-term outcome of ELBW infants with NEC and FIP in a single-center study. METHODS: Inborn and outborn ELBW infants (<1000 g) with NEC and FIP were analyzed retrospectively from 2002 to 2007. Data collected include surgical procedures, survival as well as complications, length of partial parenteral nutrition and hospital stay. The short-term and long-term outcomes after 2-7 years were assessed and compared with a matched control group. RESULTS: Out of 280 ELBW infants, 28 underwent surgery, 19 because of FIP and 9 for NEC. Fourteen infants in the FIP group were treated with primary laparotomy and 5 with peritoneal drainage (PD). In the NEC group, only 1 infant was treated with PD. PD was used for unstable patients and was always followed by secondary laparotomy after stabilization. Five of 28 (18%) surgically treated ELBW infants and 4 (14%) matched controls died. The following complications occurred in the surgical group: complete (n = 1) or minor wound dehiscence (n = 4), stoma prolapse (n = 5), parastomal hernia (n = 2), stoma fistula (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 2). Dependency on parenteral nutrition was significantly shorter in infants with FIP, while there were no differences in time to stoma closure and length of hospital stay between those with FIP and those with NEC. Eleven of 23 (47.8%) surviving patients with FIP or NEC showed developmental delay, compared with 9 of 24 (37.5%) in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The management of EBLW infants with NEC and FIP remains challenging. Our treatment approach was associated with low mortality. Developmental delay seems to be caused by extreme prematurity rather than NEC- or FIP-related bowel perforation.
BACKGROUND:Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP) are major causes of morbidity in infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical procedures applied, and the survival and long-term outcome of ELBW infants with NEC and FIP in a single-center study. METHODS: Inborn and outborn ELBW infants (<1000 g) with NEC and FIP were analyzed retrospectively from 2002 to 2007. Data collected include surgical procedures, survival as well as complications, length of partial parenteral nutrition and hospital stay. The short-term and long-term outcomes after 2-7 years were assessed and compared with a matched control group. RESULTS: Out of 280 ELBW infants, 28 underwent surgery, 19 because of FIP and 9 for NEC. Fourteen infants in the FIP group were treated with primary laparotomy and 5 with peritoneal drainage (PD). In the NEC group, only 1 infant was treated with PD. PD was used for unstable patients and was always followed by secondary laparotomy after stabilization. Five of 28 (18%) surgically treated ELBW infants and 4 (14%) matched controls died. The following complications occurred in the surgical group: complete (n = 1) or minor wound dehiscence (n = 4), stoma prolapse (n = 5), parastomal hernia (n = 2), stoma fistula (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 2). Dependency on parenteral nutrition was significantly shorter in infants with FIP, while there were no differences in time to stoma closure and length of hospital stay between those with FIP and those with NEC. Eleven of 23 (47.8%) surviving patients with FIP or NEC showed developmental delay, compared with 9 of 24 (37.5%) in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The management of EBLW infants with NEC and FIP remains challenging. Our treatment approach was associated with low mortality. Developmental delay seems to be caused by extreme prematurity rather than NEC- or FIP-related bowel perforation.
Authors: Anne Stey; Elizabeth S Barnert; Chi-Hong Tseng; Emmett Keeler; Jack Needleman; Mei Leng; Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Stephen B Shew Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 7.124