Literature DB >> 22286144

Influence of differences in case mix on the better outcome of smokers after intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischemia.

Solène Moulin1, Visnja Padjen-Bogosavljevic, Aurélie Marichal, Charlotte Cordonnier, Dejana R Jovanovic, Sophie Gautier, Hilde Hénon, Ljiljana Beslac-Bumbasirevic, Régis Bordet, Didier Leys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Thrombolysis for myocardial infarction is more effective in smokers. Our aim was to determine whether smokers treated by intravenous (i.v.) rt-PA for acute cerebral ischemia have better outcomes.
METHOD: Comparison of smokers and non-smokers for baseline characteristics and month-3 outcome in patients treated by i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischemia in Lille, France, and Belgrade, Serbia. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-1 or similar to the pre-stroke mRS. Secondary outcomes were an mRS 0-2 and death.
RESULTS: We included 459 patients (255 men; median age 65 years, interquartile range 52-76; 135 smokers). Smokers were younger (median 53 vs. 70 years, p < 0.0001) and had less severe strokes (median NIHSS 10 vs. 14, p < 0.0001). At month 3, they were more likely to have an mRS 0-1 [odds ratio (OR) 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.62], or an mRS 0-2 (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.86-4.52) and less likely to be dead (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.61). Smoking was not independently associated with outcome after adjustment for case mix [adjusted OR ((adj)OR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.52-1.43].
CONCLUSION: Smoking does not independently influence the outcome in patients treated by rt-PA for cerebral ischemia. The better outcome in smokers is the consequence of differences in case mix.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22286144     DOI: 10.1159/000334847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neurol        ISSN: 0014-3022            Impact factor:   1.710


  5 in total

1.  Smoking is Not a Good Prognostic Factor following First-Ever Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Ju-Hun Lee; Ju Young Lee; So Hyun Ahn; Min Uk Jang; Mi Sun Oh; Chul-Ho Kim; Kyung-Ho Yu; Byung-Chul Lee
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.967

2.  The smoking paradox: impact of smoking on recanalization in the setting of intra-arterial thrombolysis.

Authors:  Elena Meseguer; Julien Labreuche; Jaime Gonzalez-Valcarcel; Gaia Sirimarco; Céline Guidoux; Lucie Cabrejo; Philippa C Lavallee; Isabelle F Klein; Pierre Amarenco; Mikaël Mazighi
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2014-05-01

3.  Influence Factors and Predictive Models for the Outcome of Patients with Ischemic Stroke after Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jin Hu; Zhixian Fang; Xia Lu; Fei Wang; Ningyuan Zhang; Wenliang Pan; Xinzheng Fu; Gongchun Huang; Xiaoli Tan; Wenyu Chen
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 7.310

4.  The association between smoking and unfavorable outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with mechanical thrombectomy.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhao; Zheng Zhao; Xiaohan Zheng; Xiang Li; Xuemei Li; Chaoping Huang; Yajie Shan; Linda Nyame; Mako Ibrahim; Xiaoping Gao; Hui Liang; Jue Hu; JianJun Zou
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 5.  "Smoking paradox" is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Li; Dan Li; Jing-Feng Liu; Lin Wang; Bao-Zhu Li; Xiu-Juan Yan; Wei Liu; Kun Wu; Ruo-Lan Xiang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.