Literature DB >> 2228608

Design issues in epidemiologic studies of indoor exposure to Rn and risk of lung cancer.

J H Lubin1, J M Samet, C Weinberg.   

Abstract

Recent data on indoor air quality have indicated that Rn (222Rn) and its decay products are frequently present in domestic environments. Since studies of Rn-exposed miners have established that Rn decay products are a lung carcinogen, their presence in indoor air raises concerns about an increase in lung cancer risk for the general population. To directly evaluate lung cancer risk from domestic exposure to Rn and its decay products, as well as to evaluate risk assessments derived from studies of Rn-exposed underground miners, several epidemiologic studies of indoor Rn exposure have been initiated or are planned. This paper calculates sample sizes required for a hypothetical case-control study to address several important hypotheses and shows the impact of several difficult problems associated with estimating a subject's Rn exposure. We consider the effects of subject mobility, choice of the exposure response trend which is used to characterize an alternative hypothesis, and errors in the estimation of exposure. Imprecise estimation of Rn exposure arises from errors in the measurement device, exposure to Rn decay products from sources outside the home, inability to measure exposures over time in current as well as previous residences, and the unknown relationship between measured concentration and lung dose of alpha energy from the decay of Rn and its progeny. These methodological problems can result in large discrepancies between computed and actual study power. Failure to anticipate these problems in the design of a study can result in inaccurate estimates of power. We conclude that case-control studies of indoor Rn and lung cancer may require substantial numbers of subjects in order to address the many questions of importance that burden current risk assessments with uncertainty. We suggest pooling data from studies with the largest numbers of cases and with the most precise estimates of Rn exposure as the best approach for meeting present research needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2228608     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199012000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  20 in total

1.  The ebb and flow of radon.

Authors:  G Nicholls
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Indoor radon and lung cancer. Estimating the risks.

Authors:  J M Samet
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-01

3.  Residential radon exposure and risk of lung cancer in Missouri.

Authors:  M C Alavanja; J H Lubin; J A Mahaffey; R C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Residential exposure to magnetic fields: an empirical examination of alternative measurement strategies.

Authors:  D Baris; M S Linet; R E Tarone; R A Kleinerman; E E Hatch; W T Kaune; L L Robison; J Lubin; S Wacholder
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Performance Evaluation of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods When Assessing Effect Measure Modification.

Authors:  Gabriel Conzuelo Rodriguez; Lisa M Bodnar; Maria M Brooks; Abdus Wahed; Edward H Kennedy; Enrique Schisterman; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.363

Review 6.  Epidemiologic studies of ionizing radiation and cancer: past successes and future challenges.

Authors:  J M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Radon exposure in residences and lung cancer among women: combined analysis of three studies.

Authors:  J H Lubin; Z Liang; Z Hrubec; G Pershagen; J B Schoenberg; W J Blot; J B Klotz; Z Y Xu; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Radiation and cancer risk: a continuing challenge for epidemiologists.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  An alternative approach for investigating the carcinogenicity of indoor air pollution: pets as sentinels of environmental cancer risk.

Authors:  J A Bukowski; D Wartenberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Epidemiologic study design for investigating respiratory health effects of complex air pollution mixtures.

Authors:  D W Dockery
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.