Literature DB >> 22285668

Setup variations in radiotherapy of anal cancer: advantages of target volume reduction using image-guided radiation treatment.

Yi-Jen Chen1, Steve Suh, Rebecca A Nelson, An Liu, Richard D Pezner, Jeffrey Y C Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define setup variations in the radiation treatment (RT) of anal cancer and to report the advantages of image-guided RT (IGRT) in terms of reduction of target volume and treatment-related side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve consecutive patients with anal cancer treated by combined chemoradiation by use of helical tomotherapy from March 2007 to November 2008 were selected. With patients immobilized and positioned in place, megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) scans were performed before each treatment and were automatically registered to planning CT scans. Patients were shifted per the registration data and treated. A total of 365 MVCT scans were analyzed. The primary site received a median dose of 55 Gy. To evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage(s) of IGRT, cases were replanned according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0529, with and without adding recommended setup variations from the current study.
RESULTS: Significant setup variations were observed throughout the course of RT. The standard deviations for systematic setup correction in the anterior-posterior (AP), lateral, and superior-inferior (SI) directions and roll rotation were 1.1, 3.6, and 3.2 mm, and 0.3°, respectively. The average random setup variations were 3.8, 5.5, and 2.9 mm, and 0.5°, respectively. Without daily IGRT, margins of 4.9, 11.1, and 8.5 mm in the AP, lateral, and SI directions would have been needed to ensure that the planning target volume (PTV) received ≥95% of the prescribed dose. Conversely, daily IGRT required no extra margins on PTV and resulted in a significant reduction of V15 and V45 of intestine and V10 of pelvic bone marrow. Favorable toxicities were observed, except for acute hematologic toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily MVCT scans before each treatment can effectively detect setup variations and thereby reduce PTV margins in the treatment of anal cancer. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and IGRT provided favorable toxicities, except for acute hematologic toxicity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285668     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Guillaume Klausner; Eivind Blais; Raphaël Jumeau; Julian Biau; Mailys de Meric de Bellefon; Mahmut Ozsahin; Thomas Zilli; Raymond Miralbell; Juliette Thariat; Idriss Troussier
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Target volume motion during anal cancer image guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Corrinne J Brooks; Laurence Bernier; Vibeke N Hansen; Diana M Tait
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Impact of prone versus supine positioning on small bowel dose with pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Victor J Gonzalez; Craig R Hullett; Lindsay Burt; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Vikren Sarkar; Jonathan D Tward; Lisa J Hazard; Y Jessica Huang; Bill J Salter; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-24

4.  Quantification and Assessment of Interfraction Setup Errors Based on Cone Beam CT and Determination of Safety Margins for Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Macarena Cubillos Mesías; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Johannes Thoelking; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Hansjoerg Wertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantifying target-specific motion in anal cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Lisa Durrant; Maxwell Robinson; Maria A Hawkins; Frank Van den Heuvel; Rebecca Muirhead
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  A retrospective tomotherapy image-guidance study: analysis of more than 9,000 MVCT scans for ten different tumor sites.

Authors:  Patricia Sánchez-Rubio; Ruth Rodríguez-Romero; Pablo Castro-Tejero
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Comparison of Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Low-dose Rate Brachytherapy with or without External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Tsubokura; Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Naomi Sasaki; Daisuke Shimizu; Gen Suzuki; Satoaki Nakamura; Kei Yamada; Koji Okihara; Takumi Shiraishi; Ken Yoshida; Tatsuyuki Nishikawa; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.