Literature DB >> 22285604

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Xing-Yu Cui1, Hong-Wei Chen, Song Cai, Jian Bao, Qun-Feng Tang, Li-Yuan Wu, Xiang-Ming Fang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the sensitivity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and determine the most appropriate b value for DWI; to explore the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and the degree of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma differentiation.
METHODS: Preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance examinations were performed for 31 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Tumor ADC values were measured, and the signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-intensity ratio between the diffusion-weighted images with various b values as well as the T2-weighted images were calculated. Pathologically confirmed patients were pathologically graded to compare the ADC value with different b values of tumor at different degrees of differentiation, and the results were statistically analyzed by using the Friedman test.
RESULTS: A total of 29 cases of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were detected by DWI. As the b value increased, tumor signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio between the tumor and normal liver gradually decreased, but the tumor signal-intensity ratio gradually increased. When b=800 s/mm2, contrast-to-noise ratio between tumor and normal liver, tumor signal-intensity ratio, and tumor signal-to-noise ratio of diffusion-weighted images were all higher than those of T2-weighted images; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). As the b value increased, the tumor ADC value gradually declined. As the degree of differentiation decreased, the tumor ADC value declined.
CONCLUSION: The b value of 800 s/mm2 was the best in DWI of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; the lesion ADC value declined as the degree of cancerous tissue differentiation decreased.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285604     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following hepatic resection.

Authors:  Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Pallavi Pandey; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Prediction of the histopathologic findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: qualitative and quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Sara Lewis; Cecilia Besa; Mathilde Wagner; Kartik Jhaveri; Shingo Kihira; Hongfa Zhu; Nima Sadoughi; Sandra Fischer; Amogh Srivastava; Eric Yee; Koenraad Mortele; James Babb; Swan Thung; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Gino Puntel; Silvia Ortolani; Sara Cingarlini; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The risk factors and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher A Wadsworth; Adrian Lim; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Shahid A Khan
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Values of MRI Imaging Presentations in the Hepatobiliary Phase, DWI and T2WI Sequences in Predicting Pathological Grades of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Li-Hong Xing; Li-Yong Zhuo; Jia-Ning Wang; Yan Zhang; Feng-Ying Zhu; Chu Wang; Xiao-Ping Yin; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance evaluations of biliary malignancy and condition at high-risk for biliary malignancy: Current status.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-27

Review 7.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 8.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis, current staging, and radiological findings.

Authors:  Mohammed Saleh; Mayur Virarkar; Vlad Bura; Raul Valenzuela; Sanaz Javadi; Janio Szklaruk; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

9.  Evaluation of Free Breathing Versus Breath Hold Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Terms Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Values for Solid Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Duygu Herek; Nevzat Karabulut; Ali Kocyıgıt; Ahmet Baki Yagcı
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25

Review 10.  Multimodal molecular imaging evaluation for early diagnosis and prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jiong Liu; Wen Xiu Ren; Jian Shu
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.