Literature DB >> 22285340

Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation.

Soobok Her1, Taeheon Kang, Matthew J Fien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate and extent of complications associated with using titanium mesh for bone regeneration and to identify which factors might be associated with postoperative complications, such as infection, soft tissue exposure, and graft failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study design was used to analyze the treatment outcomes of 27 consecutive surgical sites in the maxilla and mandible that were treated with bone grafting in conjunction with fixation of titanium mesh. The primary study variable was whether the surgical sites treated with titanium mesh presented with any postoperative complications such as exposure of the titanium mesh and/or graft failure. A secondary study variable was whether treatment with bone grafting and fixation of titanium mesh provided the necessary bone augmentation required for subsequent dental implant placement. The predictor variables of maxillary versus mandibular surgical site and the type of bone graft material used were studied to determine whether any relationship exists between these variables and the aforementioned postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 27 consecutive sites in the maxilla and mandible that required substantial bone augmentation and were treated with titanium mesh were evaluated for 6 to 24 months after surgical treatment. Exposure of titanium mesh was seen in 7 (26%) of the 27 surgical sites evaluated. No significant difference in the exposure rate was seen between the maxilla and mandible or according to the type of graft material used. All 69 implants placed were in function, and the success rate was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from the present study indicate that substantial bone augmentation can be achieved using titanium mesh in conjunction with bone grafting. Furthermore, exposure of titanium mesh during healing does not necessarily compromise the final treatment outcome.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285340     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  31 in total

1.  Guided bone regeneration via a preformed titanium foil: clinical, histological and histomorphometric outcome of a case series.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; C Andrisani; S Lico; Z Ormanier; L Ottria; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 2.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

3.  Horizontal bone augmentation using two membranes at dehisced implant sites: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Rakhshinda Nahid; Monika Bansal; Samidha Pandey
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-11

Review 4.  Customized Barrier Membrane (Titanium Alloy, Poly Ether-Ether Ketone and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactide) for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; Jin Liu; Mi Du; Shengben Zhang; Yue Liu; Hu Yang; Ruiwen Shi; Yuanyuan Guo; Feng Song; Yajun Zhao; Jing Lan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Clinical and volumetric outcomes after vertical ridge augmentation using computer-aided-design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized titanium meshes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Alessandro Bianchi; Paolo Calamai; Lisa Rinaldi; Francesco Mangano; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Jung-Seok Lee; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Preliminary evaluation of a three-dimensional, customized, and preformed titanium mesh in peri-implant alveolar bone regeneration.

Authors:  Gyu-Un Jung; Jae-Yun Jeon; Kyung-Gyun Hwang; Chang-Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

8.  Virtual Surgical Planning, Stereolitographic Models and CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Fibula Flap with Iliac Crest Graft and Dental Implants.

Authors:  Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Manuel Tousidonis Rial; Raúl Antúnez-Conde; Santiago Ochandiano Caicoya; Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar; Gema Arenas de Frutos; Ángela Sada Urmeneta; María Isabel García-Hidalgo Alonso; Carlos Navarro Vila; José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco Rasia-dal Polo; Pier-Paolo Poli; Davide Rancitelli; Mario Beretta; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-11-01

10.  3D-based buccal augmentation for ideal prosthetic implant alignment-an optimized method and report on 7 cases with pronounced buccal concavities.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Nickenig; Maximilian Riekert; Matthias Zirk; Max-Philipp Lentzen; Joachim E Zöller; Matthias Kreppel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.