Literature DB >> 22285247

Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: results of the CHOICE study in Austria.

Christian Egarter1, Christoph Grimm, Kazem Nouri, Hans-Joachim Ahrendt, Johannes Bitzer, Christine Cermak.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence of the impact of contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices are limited. CHOICE (Contraceptive Health Research Of Informed Choice Experience) was a large-scale study in 11 European countries. Women in Austria aged 15-40 years considering a short-acting, reversible form of combined hormonal contraceptive were eligible to participate. The choices included the combined daily pill, weekly transdermal patch, and monthly vaginal ring. This study assessed and compared 2478 women's original preferences with their post-counselling choices and evaluated their perceptions and criteria for their choice. Women who were 'undecided' decreased from 18.1% pre-counselling to 3.2% post-counselling; significantly more women post-counselling chose the monthly ring (8.7% to 23.8%; difference 15.1%, 95% CI 13.3-16.8%; P<0.0001) or the weekly patch (6.2% to 7.8%; difference 1.7%, 95% CI 0.5-2.9%; P=0.0014). Women's primary reasons for choosing a method included 'easy to use' (daily pill, weekly patch and monthly ring) and 'still effective if I experience vomiting, diarrhoea' (weekly patch and monthly ring). Structured and balanced counselling led to changes in the method chosen.
Copyright © 2011 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22285247     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  6 in total

1.  Influence of structured counseling on women's selection of hormonal contraception in Israel: results of the CHOICE study.

Authors:  Arie Yeshaya; Amos Ber; Daniel S Seidman; Bjorn J Oddens
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-21

2.  Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer B Griffin; Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth Montgomery; Kristine Torjesen; Rachel Clark; Jill Peterson; Rachel Baggaley; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.

Authors:  Ping Teresa Yeh; Hunied Kautsar; Caitlin E Kennedy; Mary E Gaffield
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Online contraceptive discussion forums: a qualitative study to explore information provision.

Authors:  Tom Courtenay; Paula Baraitser
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-08-25

5.  Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling.

Authors:  Christian Egarter; Brigitte Frey Tirri; Johannes Bitzer; Vyacheslav Kaminskyy; Björn J Oddens; Vera Prilepskaya; Arie Yeshaya; Maya Marintcheva-Petrova; Steven Weyers
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 6.  Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Ryan T Anderson; Douglas Creedon; Victor M Montori; John Bachman; Patricia Erwin; Annie LeBlanc
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.