Literature DB >> 22285220

Abnormal cortical processing of pattern motion in amblyopia: evidence from fMRI.

B Thompson1, M Y Villeneuve, C Casanova, R F Hess.   

Abstract

Converging evidence from human psychophysics and animal neurophysiology indicates that amblyopia is associated with abnormal function of area MT, a motion sensitive region of the extrastriate visual cortex. In this context, the recent finding that amblyopic eyes mediate normal perception of dynamic plaid stimuli was surprising, as neural processing and perception of plaids has been closely linked to MT function. One intriguing potential explanation for this discrepancy is that the amblyopic eye recruits alternative visual brain areas to support plaid perception. This is the hypothesis that we tested. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the response of the amblyopic visual cortex and thalamus to incoherent and coherent motion of plaid stimuli that were perceived normally by the amblyopic eye. We found a different pattern of responses within the visual cortex when plaids were viewed by amblyopic as opposed to non-amblyopic eyes. The non-amblyopic eyes of amblyopes and control eyes differentially activated the hMT+ complex when viewing incoherent vs. coherent plaid motion, consistent with the notion that this region is centrally involved in plaid perception. However, for amblyopic eye viewing, hMT+ activation did not vary reliably with motion type. In a sub-set of our participants with amblyopia we were able to localize MT and MST within the larger hMT+ complex and found a lack of plaid motion selectivity in both sub-regions. The response of the pulvinar and ventral V3 to plaid stimuli also differed under amblyopic vs. non-amblyopic eye viewing conditions, however the response of these areas did vary according to motion type. These results indicate that while the perception of the plaid stimuli was constant for both amblyopic and non-amblyopic viewing, the network of neural areas that supported this perception was different. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285220     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Beyond Rehabilitation of Acuity, Ocular Alignment, and Binocularity in Infantile Strabismus.

Authors:  Chantal Milleret; Emmanuel Bui Quoc
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-18

2.  The Structural Properties of Major White Matter Tracts in Strabismic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Anthony M Norcia; Jason D Yeatman; Aviv Mezer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Distinct patterns of spontaneous brain activity between children and adults with anisometropic amblyopia: a resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Minglong Liang; Bing Xie; Hong Yang; Longhua Yu; Xuntao Yin; Luqing Wei; Jian Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Association of Optic Radiation Integrity with Cortical Thickness in Children with Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Shun Qi; Yun-Feng Mu; Long-Biao Cui; Rong Li; Mei Shi; Ying Liu; Jun-Qing Xu; Jian Zhang; Jian Yang; Hong Yin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 5.  The role of eye movement driven attention in functional strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Sheila Gillard Crewther; Zheng Qin Yin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

Review 7.  Neuroimaging of amblyopia and binocular vision: a review.

Authors:  Olivier Joly; Edit Frankó
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06

8.  Processing deficits of motion of contrast-modulated gratings in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Caiyuan Liu; Zhongjian Liu; Xiaopeng Hu; Yong-Qiang Yu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to assess visual deficits: a review.

Authors:  Holly D H Brown; Rachel L Woodall; Rebecca E Kitching; Heidi A Baseler; Antony B Morland
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Degraded attentional modulation of cortical neural populations in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Yee-Joon Kim; Xin Jie Lai; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.