Literature DB >> 22284283

Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.

Andrew Hockley1, Martin Weinstein, Alan J Borislow, Leonard E Braitman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient photos and silhouettes are commonly used in clinical evaluations and orthodontic research to evaluate profile esthetics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of photos or silhouettes is a more appropriate method of evaluating African American profile esthetics and whether there are different profile esthetic preferences among clinicians when using photos compared with silhouettes.
METHODS: Pretreatment records of 20 adolescent African American patients were selected (10 male, 10 female) from the orthodontic clinic at the Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia. Each patient's profile photo was digitally changed with imaging software (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif) to fabricate a series of 7 photos and 7 silhouettes with lip positions at uniform distances relative to Ricketts' E-line standard. Fifteen raters consisting of orthodontic faculty and residents were asked to select the most esthetically pleasing profile from each patient's photo series and silhouette series.
RESULTS: More rater preferences for the photographs (86%) were within the acceptable esthetic range (within 2 mm of the E-line in either direction) than were their preferences for silhouettes (66%) (P <0.001). Flatter profiles with less lip projection than the esthetic norm were more often preferred in the silhouettes than in the photos. Thirty-one percent of the silhouettes preferred by the raters were flatter than the norm compared with 9% of the photos (P = 0.003). Fuller profiles were preferred in only 3% of the silhouettes and 5% of the photos (P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Esthetic attractiveness of faces of African American orthodontic patients is rated differently in photos and silhouettes. When evaluating soft-tissue esthetic profile preferences, rater preferences in the photographs were closer to the established esthetic norm than were their preferences in the silhouettes. Using silhouettes to evaluate patient esthetics could influence clinicians or researchers to select profiles that are flatter than the established esthetic norm.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284283     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Christian Heumann; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Cintia Helena Zingaretti Junqueira; Lucas Marzullo Mendes; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Iane Souza Nery Silva; Indira Oliveira Almeida; Marine Soares Nery; Michele Luz de Souza; George Barbosa; Alex Ferreira Dos Santos; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position.

Authors:  Hui Theng Chong; Kim Wei Thea; Joseph Descallar; Yong Chen; Oyku Dalci; Ricky Wong; M Ali Darendeliler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  True vertical validation in facial orthognathic surgery planning.

Authors:  Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; Maria B Ruiz-Navarro; José M Barrera-Mora; José M Llamas-Carreras; Andreu Puigdollers-Pérez; Jorge Ayala-Puente
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01

6.  Preferences of color and lip position for facial attractiveness by laypersons and orthodontists.

Authors:  Qingjuan Shi; Hong Zheng; Rongdang Hu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Disparity in opinions on lip protrusiveness in contemporary African American faces.

Authors:  Yvette Battle; Monica Schneider; Laurence Magder; Eung-Kwon Pae
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 8.  Preventing the Complications Associated with the Use of Dermal Fillers in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: An Expert Group Consensus Report.

Authors:  Fernando Urdiales-Gálvez; Nuria Escoda Delgado; Vitor Figueiredo; José V Lajo-Plaza; Mar Mira; Francisco Ortíz-Martí; Rosa Del Rio-Reyes; Nazaret Romero-Álvarez; Sofía Ruiz Del Cueto; María A Segurado; Cristina Villanueva Rebenaque
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Evaluation of facial beauty using anthropometric proportions.

Authors:  Jovana Milutinovic; Ksenija Zelic; Nenad Nedeljkovic
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-20

10.  Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.

Authors:  Ahmad Sodagar; Darab Gholami Borujeni
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.