Literature DB >> 22284228

Factors influencing 2-year health care costs in patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion procedures.

Scott L Parker1, David N Shau, Stephen K Mendenhall, Matthew J McGirt.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Revision lumbar fusion procedures are technically challenging and can be associated with tremendous health care resource utilization and cost. There is a paucity of data regarding specific factors that significantly contribute to increased cost of care. In light of this, the authors set out to identify independent risk factors predictive of increasing 2-year direct health care costs after revision lumbar fusion.
METHODS: One hundred fifty patients undergoing revision instrument-assisted fusion for adjacent-segment disease (50 cases), pseudarthrosis (47 cases), or same-level stenosis (53 cases) were included in this study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative health states as assessed by patient-reported outcome questionnaires and perioperative complications were collected and analyzed. Two-year back-related medical resource utilization and direct health care costs were assessed. The independent association of all variables to increasing cost was assessed using multivariate linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: There was a wide range ($24,935-$63,769) in overall 2-year direct costs for patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion (mean $32,915 ± $8344 [± SD]). Preoperative variables independently associated with 2-year direct health care costs included diagnosis of congestive heart failure, more severe leg pain (visual analog scale), greater back-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and worse mental health (12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary score). There was a 1.1- to 1.2-fold increase in cost for patients in the greatest quartiles compared with those in the lowest quartiles for these variables. Surgical site infection, return to the operating room, and spine-related hospital readmission during the 90-day global health period were postoperative variables independently associated with 2-year cost. Patients in the greatest versus lowest quartiles had a 1.7- to 1.9-fold increase in cost for these variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision lumbar fusion can be associated with considerable 2-year health care costs. These costs can also vary widely among patients, as evidenced by the 2.6-fold overall cost range in this series. Although comorbidities and preoperative severity of disease states contribute to cost of care, the primary drivers of increased cost include perioperative complications such as surgical site infection, return to the operating room, and readmission during the global health period. Measures focused on health service improvement will be most successful in reducing the cost of care for patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284228     DOI: 10.3171/2011.12.SPINE11750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  15 in total

Review 1.  Impact of spine surgery complications on costs associated with management of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Samrat Yeramaneni; Chessie Robinson; Richard Hostin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

2.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Burden of disease of reoperations in instrumental spinal surgeries in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Jacob; Elena Annoni; Jennifer Scarlet Haas; Sebastian Braun; Michael Winking; Jörg Franke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Ninety-Day Readmission in Elective Revision Lumbar Fusion Surgery in the Inpatient Setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Hydrick; Nicolas Rubel; Sean Renfree; Nina Lara; Justin L Makovicka; Varun Arvind; Michael Chang; Andrew Chung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-10

5.  Comparison of Stand-Alone, Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and Cranial vs Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 for the Treatment of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Deeptee Jain; Kushagra Verma; Jeffrey Mulvihill; Jun Mizutani; Bobby Tay; Shane Burch; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

6.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Smoking-Cessation Interventions Prior to Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Thompson Zhuang; Seul Ku; Lauren M Shapiro; Serena S Hu; Akaila Cabell; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery.

Authors:  Lutfi Al-Khouja; Faris Shweikeh; Robert Pashman; J Patrick Johnson; Terrence T Kim; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 8.  Burden of Surgical Site Infections Associated with Select Spine Operations and Involvement of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Harshila Patel; Hanane Khoury; Douglas Girgenti; Sharon Welner; Holly Yu
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  Does Addition of Tobramycin Powder Reduce Infection Rates After Spine Surgery?

Authors:  Yu-Po Lee; Saifal-Deen Farhan; Arif Pendi; Torin J Cunningham; P Douglas Kiester; Peter Hahn; Charles D Rosen; Nitin Bhatia
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Cost and Hospital Resource Utilization of Staphylococcus aureus Infection Post Elective Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgeries in U.S. Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ning A Rosenthal; Kirstin H Heinrich; Jessica Chung; Holly Yu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.