Literature DB >> 22284085

A multicenter, prospective trial of total colonoscopy using a short double-balloon endoscope in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy.

Kinichi Hotta1, Shinichi Katsuki, Ken Ohata, Takashi Abe, Masaki Endo, Masaaki Shimatani, Tadanobu Nagaya, Toshihiro Kusaka, Tomoki Matsuda, Toshio Uraoka, Yuichiro Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka Murakami, Yutaka Saito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no specific insertion method for patients who previously underwent an incomplete colonoscopy. No multicenter prospective study using a double-balloon endoscope (DBE) for total colonoscopy was previously performed.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of using short DBEs in patients who previously underwent incomplete colonoscopies.
DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective trial.
SETTING: Four tertiary care academic centers and 6 community hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with a history of incomplete colonoscopy, ages 20 to 79 years, were included. Exclusion criteria were colonoscopy performed by endoscopists with experience in fewer than 1000 cases, history of colectomy, poor bowel preparation, inflammatory bowel disease, active bowel obstruction, and active bleeding. INTERVENTION: Total colonoscopies using short DBEs were attempted in all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoint was the cecal intubation rate. Secondary endpoints were time to cecal intubation, complications, and tolerability.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (62 males, median age 66.5 years) were included. Fifty-four patients had a history of abdominal surgery. The cecal intubation rate was 100% (110/110). Median intubation time was 12 minutes (range 4-47 minutes). Mild mucosal tears without symptoms occurred in 1 patient. For 64.5% of patients, intravenous sedatives and/or analgesics were used during examinations. Based on questionnaires, 50.9% had no pain, 31.8% slight pain, and 17.3% tolerable pain. Moreover, 96.4% of patients answered that their examination was more comfortable than their previous colonoscopy. LIMITATION: Uncontrolled trial.
CONCLUSION: The use of a short DBE is an effective and safe method for total colonoscopy in patients who previously underwent incomplete colonoscopies. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN3464.). Copyright Â
© 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284085     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  Tips for safety in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Takaaki Murakami; Ryohei Hirose; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Yutaka Inada; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  Advances in balloon endoscopes.

Authors:  Akihiro Araki; Kiichiro Tsuchiya; Mamoru Watanabe
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-23

3.  Double-Balloon Colonoscopy Has a Higher Cecal Intubation Rate Than Conventional Colonoscopy Using a Colon Simulator.

Authors:  Keijiro Sunada; Satoshi Shinozaki; Tomonori Yano; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Hirotsugu Sakamoto; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  When Colonoscopy Fails… Refer, Repeat, and Succeed.

Authors:  Halim Awadie; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-07

5.  Single- versus double-balloon-assisted colonoscopy after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jun Uk Lim; Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Diana L Franco; Jonathan A Leighton; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

7.  Impact of an incomplete colonoscopy referral program on recommendations after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Annapoorani Veerappan; Sean T McCarthy; Vineel Kankanala; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Atsuo Yamada; Hirotsugu Watabe; Noriyuki Takano; Goichi Togo; Yutaka Yamaji; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  High success rate of repeat colonoscopy with standard endoscopes in patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Annapoorani Veerappan; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  High Efficacy of Repeating Colonoscopy by an Advanced Endoscopist after an Incomplete Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ana Ponte; Rolando Pinho; Adélia Rodrigues; Luísa Proença; Joana Silva; Jaime P Rodrigues; Mafalda Sousa; João Carlos Silva; João Carvalho
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.