Literature DB >> 22283862

Delayed graft function, allograft and patient srvival in kidney transplantation.

Mohammad Hassan Ghadiani1, Said Peyrovi, Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab, Mojgan Jalalzadeh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delayed Graft Function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplants and the long-term relation between DGF and survival of patients and grafts is not well established.
METHODS: This is a historical cohort study of transplanted patients in Taleghani Hospital of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran between 1994 and 2010. Patients who required dialysis during the first week after transplantation were considered to have DGF. The patients' conditions were updated to determine existing graft function, graft loss or patients' death at one year and five years post transplantation in relation to the presence or absence of DGF.
RESULTS: DGF complicated 67/385 transplants (17.4%). Causes included acute tubular necrosis (58.2%), accelerated rejection (29.9%), transplant renal artery thrombosis (9%) and renal vein thrombosis (3%). More kidneys in the DGF group were procured from cadaveric donors (6% versus 0.9%, P = 0.02). At hospital discharge, patients with DGF had significantly higher mean creatinine level (4.4 ± 2.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.7; P = 0.001) compared to other patients. They also had more early acute rejection episodes and more late acute rejection episodes (34.3% versus 2% and 16.4% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.0001) compared to other patients. The proportion of functioning grafts was significantly lower in the DGF group at 1-year (53.7% versus 95.3%, P = 0.0001) and 5-years (22.4% versus 61.6%, P = 0.001) compared to patients without DGF.
CONCLUSION: The DGF group had a significantly higher acute rejection rate and an increased risk of graft loss at one and five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22283862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arab J Nephrol Transplant


  5 in total

1.  Biomarkers of delayed graft function as a form of acute kidney injury in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jolanta Malyszko; Ewelina Lukaszyk; Irena Glowinska; Magdalena Durlik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Identifying Important Risk Factors for Survival in Kidney Graft Failure Patients Using Random Survival Forests.

Authors:  Omid Hamidi; Jalal Poorolajal; Maryam Farhadian; Leili Tapak
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Prediction of Kidney Graft Rejection Using Artificial Neural Network.

Authors:  Leili Tapak; Omid Hamidi; Payam Amini; Jalal Poorolajal
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-10-31

4.  Impact of time to local recurrence on the occurrence of metastasis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A random forest survival approach.

Authors:  Enora Laas; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Anne-Sophie Michel; Nabilah Panchbhaya; Matthieu Faron; Thanh Lam; Sophie Carrez; Jean-Yves Pierga; Roman Rouzier; Florence Lerebours; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Fabien Reyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Costs of Treatment after Renal Transplantation: Is it Worth to Pay More?

Authors:  Jamshid Salamzadeh; Naghmeh Foroutan; Hamid Reza Jamshidi; Hamid Reza Rasekh; Ali Rajabzadeh Gatari; Arash Foroutan; Mohsen Nafar
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.696

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.