Literature DB >> 22283432

A European multicentre photopatch test study.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The two most common agent groups currently responsible for photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) are organic ultraviolet (UV) absorbers in sunscreens and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, availability of information on the photoallergenic potential of these agents is scarce.
OBJECTIVES: To obtain current information on the frequency of PACD to 19 organic UV absorbers and five topical NSAIDs, including newer agents, in common usage in Europe.
METHODS: A prospective, multicentre photopatch test study was conducted with 1031 patients attending for investigation of suspected PACD in 30 centres across 12 European countries.
RESULTS: A total of 346 PACD reactions in 200 (19·4%) subjects occurred. PACD was most commonly caused by the topical NSAIDs, ketoprofen (128 subjects) and etofenamate (59 subjects). Of the organic UV absorbers, octocrylene, benzophenone-3 and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane most frequently elicited PACD. The 'newer' organic sunscreen absorbers rarely led to PACD. There appeared to be an association between the agents ketoprofen, octocrylene and benzophenone-3, with several subjects developing PACD to two or all three agents concomitantly. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was less commonly observed than PACD, comprising 55 reactions in 47 (5%) subjects. Irritant reactions and photoaugmentation and photoinhibition of ACD occurred infrequently.
CONCLUSIONS: The European multicentre photopatch test study has provided current information on the relative frequency of PACD to common photoallergens. Such data will be of value when deciding on which agents to include in a future European 'baseline' photopatch test series.
© 2012 The Authors. BJD © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22283432     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10857.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  5 in total

1.  [When sunscreens do not help: allergic contact dermatitis to UV filters].

Authors:  L Ludriksone; J Tittelbach; S Schliemann; S Goetze; P Elsner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Phototoxic and photoallergic reactions].

Authors:  N J Neumann; S Schauder
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Comparison of Demographic and Photobiological Features of Chronic Actinic Dermatitis in Patients With Lighter vs Darker Skin Types.

Authors:  Ki-Wei Tan; Ann K Haylett; Tsui C Ling; Lesley E Rhodes
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  Benzophenone-3, a chemical UV-filter in cosmetics: is it really safe for children and pregnant women?

Authors:  Weronika Wnuk; Klaudia Michalska; Anna Krupa; Krystyna Pawlak
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Photoepicutaneous tests: a series of 37 Brazilian patients.

Authors:  Maria Antonieta Rios Scherrer; Vanessa Barreto Rocha
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 1.896

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.