Literature DB >> 22282889

Impact of emergency department transitions of care on thrombolytic use in acute ischemic stroke.

Olga P Madej-Fermo1, Ilene Staff, Gil Fortunato, Lincoln Abbott, Louise D McCullough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In-hospital mortality is higher for certain medical conditions based on the time of presentation to the emergency department. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether patients with acute ischemic stroke who arrived to the emergency department during a nursing shift change had similar rates of thrombolytic use and functional outcomes compared with patients presenting during nonshift change hours.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to the emergency department of a primary stroke center from 2005 through 2010. The time to notify the stroke team, perform a head CT scan, and to start intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis was assessed. Thrombolysis rates, mortality rate, discharge disposition, change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and change in modified Barthel Index at 3 and 12 months were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 3133 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 917 met criteria for inclusion. Arrival during nursing shift change, weekends, and July through September had no impact on process times, thrombolysis rates, and functional outcomes. Arrival at night did result in longer time to intra-arterial but not to intravenous thrombolysis, higher mortality rate, and smaller gain in functional status as measured by the modified Barthel Index at 3 months. The degree of emergency department "busyness" also did not influence tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment times.
CONCLUSIONS: Presentation during a nursing shift change, a time of transition of care, did not delay thrombolytic use in eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke. Presentation with acute ischemic stroke at night did result in delays of care for patients undergoing interventional therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282889     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.643437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  6 in total

1.  Recommendations for Endovascular Care of Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Michelle Hill; Brenda A Glenn; Brenda J Reese; Benjamin Morrow
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-11-17

2.  Context is Key: Using the Audit Log to Capture Contextual Factors Affecting Stroke Care Processes.

Authors:  Morteza Noshad; Christian C Rose; Robert Thombley; Jonathan Chiang; Conor K Corbin; Minh Nguyen; Vincent X Liu; Julia Adler-Milstein; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Emergency Overcrowding Impact on the Quality of Care of Patients Presenting with Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Mehdi Momeni; Elnaz Vahidi; Javad Seyedhosseini; Alemeh Jarchi; Zeinab Naderpour; Morteza Saeedi
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-04

4.  Loss of vascular early response gene reduces edema formation after experimental stroke.

Authors:  Fudong Liu; L Christine Turtzo; Jun Li; Jean Regard; Paul Worley; Neer Zeevi; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 5.  How can we improve stroke thrombolysis rates? A review of health system factors and approaches associated with thrombolysis administration rates in acute stroke care.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Annika Ryan; Shiho Rose; John R Attia; Erin Kerr; Claudia Koller; Christopher R Levi
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Barriers to Prompt Presentation to Emergency Departments in Colorado after Onset of Stroke Symptoms.

Authors:  Stacy A Trent; Erica A Morse; Adit A Ginde; Edward P Havranek; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.