Kurt A Mossberg1, Elizabeth Fortini. 1. Department of Physical Therapy/SHP, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-1144, USA. kmossber@utmb.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A simple test of aerobic fitness for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that is valid, reliable, and responsive to change is needed to provide clinicians a functional measure of cardiorespiratory capacity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and responsiveness to change of the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) in individuals with TBI. DESIGN: A cohort, pretest-posttest, comparison study was conducted. METHODS: Twenty-one patients performed the 6MWT upon admission to and prior to discharge from a postacute rehabilitation facility. Heart rate and distance traveled were recorded. A physiologic cost index (PCI) (beats per meter) was calculated based on steady-state heart rate. At discharge, all participants were able to perform a graded treadmill exercise test to exhaustion during which peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) was measured. RESULTS: Between admission and discharge, mean total distance increased from 342.6 m (SD=127.0) to 408.9 m (SD=124.2), and work increased from 27,185 kg·m (SD=10,528) to 34,114 kg·m (SD=12,057). The effect size indexes were 1.10 and 1.12 for distance and work, respectively. Correlations (r) between the discharge peak Vo(2) and the discharge 6MWT distance, PCI, and work were .58, -.61, and .47, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Stratification by gait speed may have improved responsiveness, especially for the slow ambulators. CONCLUSIONS: All measures correlated well with peak Vo(2), establishing an acceptable level of criterion-related (concurrent) validity. The addition of heart rate and calculating the PCI was only slightly better at predicting peak Vo(2), albeit nonsignificant, than a simple measure of total distance. The 6MWT provides a good estimate of peak aerobic capacity, and some measures are more responsive to change than others in patients recovering from TBI.
BACKGROUND: A simple test of aerobic fitness for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that is valid, reliable, and responsive to change is needed to provide clinicians a functional measure of cardiorespiratory capacity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and responsiveness to change of the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) in individuals with TBI. DESIGN: A cohort, pretest-posttest, comparison study was conducted. METHODS: Twenty-one patients performed the 6MWT upon admission to and prior to discharge from a postacute rehabilitation facility. Heart rate and distance traveled were recorded. A physiologic cost index (PCI) (beats per meter) was calculated based on steady-state heart rate. At discharge, all participants were able to perform a graded treadmill exercise test to exhaustion during which peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) was measured. RESULTS: Between admission and discharge, mean total distance increased from 342.6 m (SD=127.0) to 408.9 m (SD=124.2), and work increased from 27,185 kg·m (SD=10,528) to 34,114 kg·m (SD=12,057). The effect size indexes were 1.10 and 1.12 for distance and work, respectively. Correlations (r) between the discharge peak Vo(2) and the discharge 6MWT distance, PCI, and work were .58, -.61, and .47, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Stratification by gait speed may have improved responsiveness, especially for the slow ambulators. CONCLUSIONS: All measures correlated well with peak Vo(2), establishing an acceptable level of criterion-related (concurrent) validity. The addition of heart rate and calculating the PCI was only slightly better at predicting peak Vo(2), albeit nonsignificant, than a simple measure of total distance. The 6MWT provides a good estimate of peak aerobic capacity, and some measures are more responsive to change than others in patients recovering from TBI.
Authors: C Lucas; L W Stevenson; W Johnson; H Hartley; M A Hamilton; J Walden; V Lem; E Eagen-Bengsten Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: G H Guyatt; M J Sullivan; P J Thompson; E L Fallen; S O Pugsley; D W Taylor; L B Berman Journal: Can Med Assoc J Date: 1985-04-15 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Fenneke M van Hasselt; Paul F M Krabbe; Maarten J Postma; Anton J M Loonen Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Peter D Cox; Courtney A Frengopoulos; Susan W Hunter; C Michele Sealy; A Barry Deathe; Michael W C Payne Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Roslyn N Boyd; Emmah Baque; Adina Piovesana; Stephanie Ross; Jenny Ziviani; Leanne Sakzewski; Lee Barber; Owen Lloyd; Lynne McKinlay; Koa Whittingham; Anthony C Smith; Stephen Rose; Simona Fiori; Ross Cunnington; Robert Ware; Melinda Lewis; Tracy A Comans; Paul A Scuffham Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.474