| Literature DB >> 22282402 |
In-Hyuk Jung1, You-Han Lee, Ji-Young Yoo, Se-Jin Jeong, Seong Keun Sonn, Jong-Gil Park, Keun Ho Ryu, Bong Yong Lee, Hye Young Han, So Young Lee, Dae-Yong Kim, Hang Lee, Goo Taeg Oh.
Abstract
In this study, the synergistic effect of 6-[4-(1-cyclohexyl- 1H-tetrazol-5-yl) butoxy]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H )-quinolinone (cilostazol) and Ginkgo biloba extract (GbE) was examined in apolipoprotein E (ApoE) null mice. Co-treatment with GbE and cilostazol synergistically decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in ApoE null mice fed a high-fat diet. Co-treatment resulted in a significantly decreased atherosclerotic lesion area compared to untreated ApoE mice. The inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules such as monocyte chemoattractant-1 (MCP-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), and VCAM-1 which can initiate atherosclerosis were significantly reduced by the co-treatment of cilostazol with GbE. Further, the infiltration of macrophages into the intima was decreased by co-treatment. These results suggest that co-treatment of GbE with cilostazol has a more potent anti-atherosclerotic effect than treatment with cilostazol alone in hyperlipidemic ApoE null mice and could be a valuable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of atherosclerosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22282402 PMCID: PMC3366324 DOI: 10.3858/emm.2012.44.5.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Mol Med ISSN: 1226-3613 Impact factor: 8.718
Figure 1GbE increases the anti-oxidant activity of cilostazol. DHE fluorescence image of aortic root area from vehicle (n = 5), 0.1% cilostazol (n = 9), 0.05% cilostazol + 0.04% GbE (n = 9) and 0.1% cilostazol + 0.08% GbE treated groups (n = 12 each). Quantitative data in the lower graph represent arbitrary units for fluorescence intensity. L, lumen. Yellow arrows indicate superoxide-positive areas. Scale bars, 200 µm. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared with vehicle; and ###P < 0.001 compared with cilostazol alone.
Figure 2GbE with cilostazol synergistically decreases the atherosclerotic lesion size in aortic root area of ApoE null mice fed a high-fat diet. High dose of cilostazol (0.1%) and GbE (0.08%) treatment reduced fatty streak lesions in ApoE null mice. (A) Oil red O-stained frozen section of aortic sinus from vehicle (n = 5), 0.1% cilostazol (n = 7), 0.05% cilostazol + 0.04% GbE (n = 7) and 0.1% cilostazol + 0.08% GbE (n = 7) treated groups. (B) Aortic en face view of vehicle (n = 5), 0.1% cilostazol (n = 7), 0.05% cilostazol + 0.04% GbE (n = 9) and 0.1% cilostazol + 0.08% GbE (n = 5) treated groups. Representative Oil red O staining of atherosclerotic lesions in each group is shown. Quantitative data in the lower graph represent plaque area. *P < 0.05 compared with vehicle.
Analysis of serum inflammatory molecules in ApoE null mice fed high fat diet supplemented with each compounds
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compare to vehicle group. IL-6, interleukin-6; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.
Figure 3Co-treatment of cilostazol and GbE decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine production. The effect of co-treatment of cilostazol and GbE on MCP-1 (A) and VCAM-1 (B) levels in the atherosclerotic lesion of vehicle (n = 7 or 9), 0.1% cilostazol (n = 7 or 9), 0.05% cilostazol + 0.04% GbE (n = 6 or 9), and 0.1% cilostazol + 0.08% GbE treated groups (n = 8 or 10). Representative immunohistochemical staining for MCP-1 and VCAM-1 in each group is also shown. Quantitative data in the lower graph represent positive stained area in the plaque. L, lumen. Yellow arrows indicate MCP-1 and VCAM-1-positive areas. Scale bars, 200 µm. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with vehicle; ##P < 0.01 compared with cilostazol alone.
Figure 4Co-treatment of cilostazol and GbE inhibits macrophage infiltration. Representative immunostaining for macrophages in the aortic root area from vehicle (n = 5), 0.1% cilostazol (n = 10), 0.05% cilostazol + 0.04% GbE (n = 8), and 0.1% cilostazol + 0.08% GbE treated groups (n = 8). Quantitative data in the lower graph represent positive stained area percentage of total plaque area. L, lumen. Yellow arrows indicate a macrophage-positive area. Scale bars, 200 µm. **P < 0.01 compared with vehicle; #P < 0.05 compared with cilostazol alone.