Literature DB >> 22282327

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Sachin S Goel1, Shikhar Agarwal, E Murat Tuzcu, Stephen G Ellis, Lars G Svensson, Tarique Zaman, Navkaranbir Bajaj, Lee Joseph, Neil S Patel, Olcay Aksoy, William J Stewart, Brian P Griffin, Samir R Kapadia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the availability of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, management of coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is posing challenges. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe AS and coronary artery disease remain unknown. We sought to compare the short-term outcomes of PCI in patients with and without AS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From our PCI database, we identified 254 patients with severe AS who underwent PCI between 1998 and 2008. Using propensity matching, we found 508 patients without AS who underwent PCI in the same period. The primary end point of 30-day mortality after PCI was similar in patients with and without severe AS (4.3% [11 of 254] versus 4.7% [24 of 508]; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.69; P=0.2). Patients with low ejection fraction (≤30%) and severe AS had a higher 30-day post-PCI mortality compared with those with an ejection fraction >30% (5.4% [7 of 45] versus 1.2% [4 of 209]; P<0.001). In addition, AS patients with high Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (≥10) had a higher 30-day post-PCI mortality than those with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score <10 (10.4% [10 of 96] versus 0%; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PCI can be performed in patients with severe symptomatic AS and coronary artery disease without an increased risk of short-term mortality compared with propensity-matched patients without AS. Patients with ejection fraction ≤30% and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score ≥10% are at a highest risk of 30-day mortality after PCI. This finding has significant implications in the management of severe coronary artery disease in high-risk severe symptomatic AS patients being considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282327     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

Review 1.  To revascularize or not before transcatheter aortic valve implantation?

Authors:  Sergio Perez; Torin P Thielhelm; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  2020 update of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGHTG) on the position statement of the ÖKG and ÖGHTG for transcatheter aortic valve implantation 2011.

Authors:  Gudrun Lamm; Matthias Hammerer; Uta C Hoppe; Martin Andreas; Rudolf Berger; Ronald K Binder; Nikolaos Bonaros; Georg Delle-Karth; Matthias Frick; Michael Grund; Bernhard Metzler; Thomas Neunteufl; Philipp Pichler; Albrecht Schmidt; Wilfried Wisser; Andreas Zierer; Rainald Seitelberger; Michael Grimm; Alexander Geppert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Does the presence of coronary artery disease affect the outcome of aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Kaoru Matsuura; Hideki Ueda; Hiroki Kohno; Yusaku Tamura; Michiko Watanabe; Tomohiko Inui; Yuichi Inage; Yasunori Yakita; Goro Matsumiya
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 5.  Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ahmed Al Mustafa; Zakeih Chaker; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Stress positron emission tomography is safe and can guide coronary revascularization in high-risk patients being considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Paul C Cremer; Shaden Khalaf; Junyang Lou; Leonardo Rodriguez; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Timing and Outcomes of PCI in the TAVR Era.

Authors:  Konstantinos V Voudris; Peter Petropulos; Panagiotis Karyofillis; Konstantinos Charitakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 8.  Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-02

9.  Management of Coronary Artery Disease and Conduction Abnormalities in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Anna Kostopoulou; Panagiotis Karyofillis; Efthimios Livanis; George Karavolias; George Theodorakis; John Paraskevaides; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

10.  Higher plasma level of STIM1, OPG are correlated with stent restenosis after PCI.

Authors:  Haibin Li; Zhian Jiang; Xiangdong Liu; Zhihui Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.