Literature DB >> 22282218

Paracentral retinal holes occurring after macular surgery: incidence, clinical features, and evolution.

Otman Sandali1, Mohamed El Sanharawi, Elena Basli, Nicolas Lecuen, Sebastien Bonnel, Vincent Borderie, Laurent Laroche, Claire Monin.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe the incidence, clinical features, and evolution of paracentral retinal holes occurring after macular surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective non-randomized study of 909 patients operated on for either a macular hole (MH, n = 400 patients) or an epiretinal membrane (ERM, n = 509 patients) between 2004 and 2009. Six patients (0.6%) developed a paracentral macular hole after surgery. Their clinical, auto-fluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics as well as their visual outcomes were studied.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 70 years. Paracentral holes occurred approximately 5 weeks after surgery (with a range of 2-12 weeks). All patients were asymptomatic. Five patients underwent ILM peeling during initial surgery. Paracentral retinal holes were located superiorly to the fovea in three cases and temporally in the other three cases. Mean pre-operative BCVA was 20/200 and mean post-operative BCVA was 20/40. The eye where the eccentric MHs were closest to the fovea (inferior to 1 optic disc area) had the poorest final visual acuity. Autofluorescence imaging showed a bright fluorescence in paramacular holes. On OCT images, they were shown to be flat full-thickness holes. No treatment was attempted. No rhegmatogenous complications or choroidal neovascularization occurred in any of the patients. Mean follow-up was 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, paracentral MHs are uncommon complications which can occur at the site where ILM peeling has been initiated or completed. Except for the closest holes to fovea, they have good visual prognosis and do not require any treatment underlining the importance of initiating the ILM peeling as far as possible from the fovea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282218     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-1935-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20-gauge vs 23-gauge vs 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Harry W Flynn; Nur Acar; Sundeep Dev; Saad Shaikh; Robert A Mittra; J Fernando Arevalo; Andres Kychenthal; Allen Kunselman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Internal limiting membrane removal during macular hole surgery: results of a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Rosita Grandin; Giorgia Sanguinetti; Daniela Minutola; Marta Di Nicola; Rocco Di Mascio; Giuseppe Ravalico
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal.

Authors:  P Steven; H Laqua; D Wong; H Hoerauf
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases.

Authors:  Otman Sandali; Mohamed El Sanharawi; Nicolas Lecuen; Pierre-Olivier Barale; Sebastien Bonnel; Elena Basli; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche; Claire Monin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Paracentral scotomata: a new finding after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  C Haritoglou; O Ehrt; C A Gass; N Kristin; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A new concept for vitreous surgery. 7. Two instrument techniques in pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  R Machemer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-11

7.  Assessment of macular function by multifocal electroretinography following epiretinal membrane surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Ji Won Lim; Joon Hee Cho; Ha Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-30

8.  Vitrectomy for macular pucker.

Authors:  R G Michels
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Epimacular proliferative response following internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Riyo Uemoto; Shuichi Yamamoto; Shinobu Takeuchi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Iatrogenic eccentric full thickness macular holes following vitrectomy with ILM peeling for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  A Rubinstein; R Bates; L Benjamin; A Shaikh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  12 in total

1.  Postoperative eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Dimitrios Brouzas; Maria Dettoraki; Anastasios Lavaris; Dimitrios Kourvetaris; Nikolaos Nomikarios; Marilita M Moschos
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Postoperative eccentric macular holes after surgery for vitreomacular interface diseases.

Authors:  Esat Yetkin; Mehmet Citirik; Mehmet Yasin Teke; Hasan Kiziltoprak
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Pneumatic tools for vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Jose Luis Vallejo-Garcia; Alessandro Randazzo; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-13

Review 4.  Complications of Macular Peeling.

Authors:  Mónica Asencio-Duran; Beatriz Manzano-Muñoz; José Luis Vallejo-García; Jesús García-Martínez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole: A Case Report.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; George Theodossiadis; Maria Douvali; Alexandros A Rouvas; Panagiotis Theodossiadis
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-20

6.  Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: A Case Report.

Authors:  Christina Garnavou-Xirou; Tina Xirou; Stamatina Kabanarou; Ilias Gkizis; Stavros Velissaris; Irini Chatziralli
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-10-17

7.  Multiple extrafoveal macular holes following internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Nazimul Hussain; Sandip Mitra
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 8.  Vitrectomy in high myopia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michele Coppola; Alessandro Rabiolo; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Giuseppe Querques; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2017-10-02

9.  Multimodal imaging of multiple macular holes.

Authors:  Aditya Verma; Preet Kanwar Sodhi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in the Management of Retinal Detachment due to Paracentral Retinal Breaks.

Authors:  Yen-Chih Chen; Chung-May Yang; San-Ni Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.