INTRODUCTION: there is evidence to suggest that delirium incidence can be reduced in older people admitted to medical services using multi-component interventions that target delirium risk factors. The cost-effectiveness of this approach is uncertain. We therefore developed a novel cost-effectiveness model for delirium prevention. METHOD: we compared multi-component delirium prevention intervention with usual care using a model based on a decision tree analysis. The model was used to estimate the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). The robustness of the cost-effectiveness result was explored using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULT: the multi-component prevention intervention was cost-effective when compared with usual care. It was associated with an INMB of £2,200 using a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). It remained cost-effective in the majority of the deterministic sensitivity analyses and was cost-effective in 96.8% of the simulations carried out in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. DISCUSSION: our analysis has shown convincingly that multi-component prevention interventions for delirium should be considered as a cost-effective health-care strategy for medically ill people admitted to hospital. It is an attractive intervention for health-care planners as they strive to reconfigure their services to better meet the needs of an ageing population.
INTRODUCTION: there is evidence to suggest that delirium incidence can be reduced in older people admitted to medical services using multi-component interventions that target delirium risk factors. The cost-effectiveness of this approach is uncertain. We therefore developed a novel cost-effectiveness model for delirium prevention. METHOD: we compared multi-component delirium prevention intervention with usual care using a model based on a decision tree analysis. The model was used to estimate the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). The robustness of the cost-effectiveness result was explored using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULT: the multi-component prevention intervention was cost-effective when compared with usual care. It was associated with an INMB of £2,200 using a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). It remained cost-effective in the majority of the deterministic sensitivity analyses and was cost-effective in 96.8% of the simulations carried out in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. DISCUSSION: our analysis has shown convincingly that multi-component prevention interventions for delirium should be considered as a cost-effective health-care strategy for medically ill people admitted to hospital. It is an attractive intervention for health-care planners as they strive to reconfigure their services to better meet the needs of an ageing population.
Authors: Julia Krämer; Katharina Nolte; Laura Zupanc; Stefan Schnitker; Anna Roos; Christopher Göpel; Janina Santos Cid; Kirsten Eichler; Thomas van den Hooven; Georg Hempel; Hermann-Joseph Pavenstädt; Christoph Klaas; Georg Gosheger; Michael J Raschke; Heinz Wiendl; Thomas Duning Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 8.251
Authors: Jennifer K Burton; Louise Craig; Shun Qi Yong; Najma Siddiqi; Elizabeth A Teale; Rebecca Woodhouse; Amanda J Barugh; Alison M Shepherd; Alan Brunton; Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton; Terry J Quinn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-26
Authors: Melissa L P Mattison; Angela Catic; Roger B Davis; Daniele Olveczky; Julie Moran; Julius Yang; Mark Aronson; Mark Zeidel; Lewis Lipsitz; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sandeep R Pagali; Donna Miller; Karen Fischer; Darrell Schroeder; Norman Egger; Dennis M Manning; Maria I Lapid; Robert J Pignolo; M Caroline Burton Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: James Michael Fisher; Adam Lee Gordon; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Ellen Tullo; Daniel H J Davis; Adrian Blundell; Robert H Field; Andrew Teodorczuk Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jennifer K Burton; Louise E Craig; Shun Qi Yong; Najma Siddiqi; Elizabeth A Teale; Rebecca Woodhouse; Amanda J Barugh; Alison M Shepherd; Alan Brunton; Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton; Terry J Quinn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-19
Authors: John Young; Francine Cheater; Michelle Collinson; Marie Fletcher; Anne Forster; Mary Godfrey; John Green; Shamaila Anwar; Suzanne Hartley; Claire Hulme; Sharon K Inouye; David Meads; Gillian Santorelli; Najma Siddiqi; Jane Smith; Elizabeth Teale; Amanda J Farrin Journal: Trials Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 2.279