Literature DB >> 22281355

Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.

G Su1, P Madsen, U S Nielsen, E A Mäntysaari, G P Aamand, O F Christensen, M S Lund.   

Abstract

This study investigated the accuracy of direct genomic breeding values (DGV) using a genomic BLUP model, genomic enhanced breeding values (GEBV) using a one-step blending approach, and GEBV using a selection index blending approach for 15 traits of Nordic Red Cattle. The data comprised 6,631 bulls of which 4,408 bulls were genotyped using Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA). To validate reliability of genomic predictions, about 20% of the youngest genotyped bulls were taken as test data set. Deregressed proofs (DRP) were used as response variables for genomic predictions. Reliabilities of genomic predictions in the validation analyses were measured as squared correlations between DRP and genomic predictions corrected for reliability of DRP, based on the bulls in the test data sets. A set of weighting (scaling) factors was used to construct the combined relationship matrix among genotyped and nongenotyped bulls for one-step blending, and to scale DGV and its expected reliability in the selection index blending. Weighting (scaling) factors had a small influence on reliabilities of GEBV, but a large influence on the variation of GEBV. Based on the validation analyses, averaged over the 15 traits, the reliability of DGV for bulls without daughter records was 11.0 percentage points higher than the reliability of conventional pedigree index. Further gain of 0.9 percentage points was achieved by combining information from conventional pedigree index using the selection index blending, and gain of 1.3 percentage points was achieved by combining information of genotyped and nongenotyped bulls simultaneously applying the one-step blending. These results indicate that genomic selection can greatly improve the accuracy of preselection for young bulls in Nordic Red population, and the one-step blending approach is a good alternative to predict GEBV in practical genetic evaluation program.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22281355     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  32 in total

1.  Genomic selection in American mink (Neovison vison) using a SSGBLUP model for size and quality traits graded on live mink.

Authors:  Trine M Villumsen; Guosheng Su; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Torben Asp; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Sheng Wang; Ju Huang; Leyi Li; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Using machine learning to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of reproduction traits in pigs.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Shaolei Shi; Guijiang Wang; Wenxue Luo; Xia Wei; Ao Qiu; Fei Luo; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.

Authors:  Egill Gautason; Goutam Sahana; Guosheng Su; Baldur Helgi Benjamínsson; Guðmundur Jóhannesson; Bernt Guldbrandtsen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Hongding Gao; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Ulrik S Nielsen; Yuan Zhang; Mogens S Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Guosheng Su; Ole F Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Mark Henryon; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Beatriz C D Cuyabano; Guosheng Su; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The effect of using genealogy-based haplotypes for genomic prediction.

Authors:  Vahid Edriss; Rohan L Fernando; Guosheng Su; Mogens S Lund; Bernt Guldbrandtsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Consistency of linkage disequilibrium between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and genomic prediction for Chinese Holsteins using a joint reference population.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Xiangdong Ding; Qin Zhang; Yachun Wang; Mogens S Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Selection of haplotype variables from a high-density marker map for genomic prediction.

Authors:  Beatriz Cd Cuyabano; Guosheng Su; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.