OBJECTIVE: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder causing considerable impairment to daily living. This article is an overview of a comprehensive Cochrane meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists (DAs), the first-line treatment of RLS. METHODS: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched for double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DAs vs placebo. RESULTS: Thirty-five placebo-controlled RCTs (total number of patients=6954) were eligible. The likelihood of bias was considered to be low. The mean treatment duration of the RCTs was 10.3 (standard deviation 7.3) weeks, with treatment durations up to seven months. Overall, DAs showed a moderate improvement in the International RLS Severity Scale score (mean difference -5.7 points [95% confidence interval, CI, -6.7 to -4.7; P<0.00001]) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement response (risk ratio 1.44 [95% CI 1.34-1.54; P<0.00001]) compared with placebo. Periodic limb movements decreased by -22.38/h (95% CI -27.8 to -16.9; P<0.00001) for DAs compared with placebo. Sleep quality and disease-specific quality of life increased slightly to moderately. Safety data confirmed the established safety characteristics of DAs. Augmentation, a specific side-effect of dopaminergic treatment of RLS, was not assessed adequately. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that DAs have moderate efficacy in the treatment of RLS. Actively controlled and long-term studies are still lacking. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to identify the most efficient treatments for this chronic disorder.
OBJECTIVE:Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder causing considerable impairment to daily living. This article is an overview of a comprehensive Cochrane meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists (DAs), the first-line treatment of RLS. METHODS: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched for double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DAs vs placebo. RESULTS: Thirty-five placebo-controlled RCTs (total number of patients=6954) were eligible. The likelihood of bias was considered to be low. The mean treatment duration of the RCTs was 10.3 (standard deviation 7.3) weeks, with treatment durations up to seven months. Overall, DAs showed a moderate improvement in the International RLS Severity Scale score (mean difference -5.7 points [95% confidence interval, CI, -6.7 to -4.7; P<0.00001]) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement response (risk ratio 1.44 [95% CI 1.34-1.54; P<0.00001]) compared with placebo. Periodic limb movements decreased by -22.38/h (95% CI -27.8 to -16.9; P<0.00001) for DAs compared with placebo. Sleep quality and disease-specific quality of life increased slightly to moderately. Safety data confirmed the established safety characteristics of DAs. Augmentation, a specific side-effect of dopaminergic treatment of RLS, was not assessed adequately. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that DAs have moderate efficacy in the treatment of RLS. Actively controlled and long-term studies are still lacking. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to identify the most efficient treatments for this chronic disorder.
Authors: Julia S Seay; Roger McIntosh; Erin M Fekete; Mary Ann Fletcher; Mahendra Kumar; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Diego Garcia-Borreguero; Jeffrey Patrick; Sarah DuBrava; Philip M Becker; Alan Lankford; Crystal Chen; Jeffrey Miceli; Lloyd Knapp; Richard P Allen Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Wei Zhang; Ye Wang; Shu Yan Cong; Jian Fei Nao; Juan Feng; Guo Rong Bi Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Derek Spieler; Maria Kaffe; Franziska Knauf; José Bessa; Juan J Tena; Florian Giesert; Barbara Schormair; Erik Tilch; Heekyoung Lee; Marion Horsch; Darina Czamara; Nazanin Karbalai; Christine von Toerne; Melanie Waldenberger; Christian Gieger; Peter Lichtner; Melina Claussnitzer; Ronald Naumann; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Miguel Torres; Lillian Garrett; Jan Rozman; Martin Klingenspor; Valérie Gailus-Durner; Helmut Fuchs; Martin Hrabě de Angelis; Johannes Beckers; Sabine M Hölter; Thomas Meitinger; Stefanie M Hauck; Helmut Laumen; Wolfgang Wurst; Fernando Casares; Jose Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Juliane Winkelmann Journal: Genome Res Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 9.043