Literature DB >> 22280595

Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction.

Stefan J Mauger1, Pam W Dawson, Adam A Hersbach.   

Abstract

Noise reduction in cochlear implants has achieved significant speech perception improvements through spectral subtraction and signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction techniques. Current methods use gain functions derived through mathematical optimization or motivated by normal listening psychoacoustic experiments. Although these gain functions have been able to improve speech perception, recent studies have indicated that they are not optimal for cochlear implant noise reduction. This study systematically investigates cochlear implant recipients' speech perception and listening preference of noise reduction with a range of gain functions. Results suggest an advantageous gain function and show that gain functions currently used for noise reduction are not optimal for cochlear implant recipients. Using the cochlear implant optimised gain function, a 27% improvement over the current advanced combination encoder (ACE) stimulation strategy in speech weighted noise and a 7% improvement over current noise reduction strategies were observed in babble noise conditions. The optimized gain function was also most preferred by cochlear implant recipients. The CI specific gain function derived from this study can be easily incorporated into existing noise reduction strategies, to further improve listening performance for CI recipients in challenging environments.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22280595     DOI: 10.1121/1.3665990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Mark E Lutman; Stephan D Ewert; Guoping Li; Stefan Bleeck
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  A clinical assessment of cochlear implant recipient performance: implications for individualized map settings in specific environments.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Thomas Hocke; Stefan Mauger; Joachim Müller-Deile
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Federico Bolner; Jessica J M Monaghan; Bas van Dijk; Andrzej Zarowski; Stefan Bleeck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Using recurrent neural networks to improve the perception of speech in non-stationary noise by people with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Mahmoud Keshavarzi; Robert P Carlyon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A wavelet-based noise reduction algorithm and its clinical evaluation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hua Ye; Guang Deng; Stefan J Mauger; Adam A Hersbach; Pam W Dawson; John M Heasman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Chris D Warren; Michelle R Knight; Michael Goorevich; Esti Nel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.