Literature DB >> 22279433

rTMS for Tinnitus.

Robert L Folmer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22279433      PMCID: PMC3260457          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


× No keyword cloud information.
I applaud the authors of the article “Can temporal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation be enhanced by targeting affective components of tinnitus with frontal rTMS? a randomized controlled pilot trial” because many of them are pioneers in the development of protocols that use rTMS to treat chronic tinnitus. Investigators (including myself) around the world conducting similar studies of rTMS for tinnitus often follow the procedural examples of these researcher–clinicians in Germany. In this recent publication, Kreuzer et al. (2011) compared the effects of 2000 daily pulses of rTMS delivered to patients’ left temporal region with a protocol that began with 1000 pulses of right frontal rTMS followed by 1000 pulses of left temporal rTMS. In both protocols, patients exhibited improvement in measures of tinnitus severity. However, there was no significant difference in treatment outcomes between the left temporal and the combined (right frontal + left temporal) rTMS protocols. I would like to add a few comments about this study: No placebo condition was included. Because the placebo effect can be significant for many tinnitus patients (Dobie, 1999), a placebo condition should be used in most clinical trials involving this population. The fact that patients’ scores for the Tinnitus Questionnaire, THI, and BDI all declined from the time of screening to the time just before the first rTMS session (baseline) illustrates, I believe, the placebo effect (or, as the authors describe it, “an anticipation effect”). This decline in scores from screening to baseline is similar in magnitude to the decline in scores that occurred during rTMS treatment. The authors state that they used a left temporal coil placement for rTMS (regardless of the location of patientstinnitus perception) in order to compare results with previous studies that used the same coil placement. However, because Frank et al. (2010) reported that left temporal rTMS was not effective for patients with right-side tinnitus, it is time for researchers to re-evaluate rTMS coil placement in experimental designs. All of us conducting rTMS studies for tinnitus realize that many procedural questions need to be addressed before this treatment option can reach its full clinical potential. We thank our colleagues in Germany for continuing to conduct studies that increase our understanding and contribute to improvements in this area of research.
  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of randomized clinical trials in tinnitus.

Authors:  R A Dobie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Left temporal low-frequency rTMS for the treatment of tinnitus: clinical predictors of treatment outcome--a retrospective study.

Authors:  G Frank; T Kleinjung; M Landgrebe; V Vielsmeier; C Steffenhagen; J Burger; E Frank; G Vollberg; G Hajak; B Langguth
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.089

3.  Can Temporal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation be Enhanced by Targeting Affective Components of Tinnitus with Frontal rTMS? A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Peter Michael Kreuzer; Michael Landgrebe; Martin Schecklmann; Timm B Poeppl; Veronika Vielsmeier; Goeran Hajak; Tobias Kleinjung; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-04
  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: a proposal for an international standard.

Authors:  Michael Landgrebe; Andréia Azevedo; David Baguley; Carol Bauer; Anthony Cacace; Claudia Coelho; John Dornhoffer; Ricardo Figueiredo; Herta Flor; Goeran Hajak; Paul van de Heyning; Wolfgang Hiller; Eman Khedr; Tobias Kleinjung; Michael Koller; Jose Miguel Lainez; Alain Londero; William H Martin; Mark Mennemeier; Jay Piccirillo; Dirk De Ridder; Rainer Rupprecht; Grant Searchfield; Sven Vanneste; Florian Zeman; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Measuring Driver Perception: Combining Eye-Tracking and Automated Road Scene Perception.

Authors:  Jork Stapel; Mounir El Hassnaoui; Riender Happee
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Neural correlates of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity in sharing decisions.

Authors:  Berna Güroğlu; Geert-Jan Will; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sixty hertz neurostimulation amplifies subthalamic neural synchrony in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Zack Blumenfeld; Anca Velisar; Mandy Miller Koop; Bruce C Hill; Lauren A Shreve; Emma J Quinn; Camilla Kilbane; Hong Yu; Jaimie M Henderson; Helen Brontë-Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of psilocybin microdosing on awe and aesthetic experiences: a preregistered field and lab-based study.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; George Fejer; Pascal Lempe; Luisa Prochazckova; Martin Kuchar; Katerina Hajkova; Josephine Marschall
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Development and testing of a game-based digital intervention for working memory training in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Surbhit Wagle; Arka Ghosh; P Karthic; Akriti Ghosh; Tarana Pervaiz; Rashmi Kapoor; Koumudi Patil; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.