Literature DB >> 22278705

Fish welfare assurance system: initial steps to set up an effective tool to safeguard and monitor farmed fish welfare at a company level.

J W van de Vis1, M Poelman, E Lambooij, M-L Bégout, M Pilarczyk.   

Abstract

The objective was to take a first step in the development of a process-oriented quality assurance (QA) system for monitoring and safeguarding of fish welfare at a company level. A process-oriented approach is focused on preventing hazards and involves establishment of critical steps in a process that requires careful control. The seven principles of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) concept were used as a framework to establish the QA system. HACCP is an internationally agreed approach for management of food safety, which was adapted for the purpose of safeguarding and monitoring the welfare of farmed fish. As the main focus of this QA system is farmed fish welfare assurance at a company level, it was named Fish Welfare Assurance System (FWAS). In this paper we present the initial steps of setting up FWAS for on growing of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), carp (Cyprinus carpio) and European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Four major hazards were selected, which were fish species dependent. Critical Control Points (CCPs) that need to be controlled to minimize or avoid the four hazards are presented. For FWAS, monitoring of CCPs at a farm level is essential. For monitoring purposes, Operational Welfare Indicators (OWIs) are needed to establish whether critical biotic, abiotic, managerial and environmental factors are controlled. For the OWIs we present critical limits/target values. A critical limit is the maximum or minimum value to which a factor must be controlled at a critical control point to prevent, eliminate or reduce a hazard to an acceptable level. For managerial factors target levels are more appropriate than critical limits. Regarding the international trade of farmed fish products, we propose that FWAS needs to be standardized in aquaculture chains. For this standardization a consensus on the concept of fish welfare, methods to assess welfare objectively and knowledge on the needs of farmed fish are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278705     DOI: 10.1007/s10695-011-9596-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0920-1742            Impact factor:   2.794


  9 in total

1.  Are fish the victims of 'speciesism'? A discussion about fear, pain and animal consciousness.

Authors:  Stephanie Yue Cottee
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.794

Review 2.  A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis.

Authors:  S Mechiel Korte; Berend Olivier; Jaap M Koolhaas
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-12-15

Review 3.  CRF and stress in fish.

Authors:  Gert Flik; Peter H M Klaren; Erwin H Van den Burg; Juriaan R Metz; Mark O Huising
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 2.822

Review 4.  Expanding the moral circle: farmed fish as objects of moral concern.

Authors:  Vonne Lund; Cecilie M Mejdell; Helena Röcklinsberg; Ray Anthony; Tore Håstein
Journal:  Dis Aquat Organ       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 1.802

Review 5.  Animal welfare: concepts and measurement.

Authors:  D M Broom
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Annual rhythms of demand-feeding activity in sea bass: evidence of a seasonal phase inversion of the diel feeding pattern.

Authors:  F J Sánchez-Vázquez; M Azzaydi; F J Martínez; S Zamora; J A Madrid
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 7.  Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator.

Authors:  Helmut Segner; Henrik Sundh; Kurt Buchmann; Jessica Douxfils; Kristina Snuttan Sundell; Cédric Mathieu; Neil Ruane; Fredrik Jutfelt; Hilde Toften; Lloyd Vaughan
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 2.794

8.  Pituitary hormone mRNA expression in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax in seawater and following acclimation to fresh water.

Authors:  Stamatis Varsamos; Benoît Xuereb; Thérèse Commes; Gert Flik; Céline Spanings-Pierrot
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Circadian rhythms of feeding activity in sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L.: dual phasing capacity of diel demand-feeding pattern.

Authors:  F J Sánchez-Vázquez; J A Madrid; S Zamora
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.182

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Allostatic Load and Stress Physiology in European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) and Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L.).

Authors:  Athanasios Samaras; Carlos Espírito Santo; Nikos Papandroulakis; Nikolaos Mitrizakis; Michail Pavlidis; Erik Höglund; Thamar N M Pelgrim; Jan Zethof; F A Tom Spanings; Marco A Vindas; Lars O E Ebbesson; Gert Flik; Marnix Gorissen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Stunning fish with CO2 or electricity: contradictory results on behavioural and physiological stress responses.

Authors:  A Gräns; L Niklasson; E Sandblom; K Sundell; B Algers; C Berg; T Lundh; M Axelsson; H Sundh; A Kiessling
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.