UNLABELLED: The nuclear bile acid receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), is an important transcriptional regulator of liver metabolism. Despite recent advances in understanding its functions, how FXR regulates genomic targets and whether the transcriptional regulation by FXR is altered in obesity remain largely unknown. Here, we analyzed hepatic genome-wide binding sites of FXR in healthy and dietary obese mice by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis. A total of 15,263 and 5,272 FXR binding sites were identified in livers of healthy and obese mice, respectively, after a short 1-hour treatment with the synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064. Of these sites, 7,440 and 2,344 were detected uniquely in healthy and obese mice. FXR-binding sites were localized mostly in intergenic and intron regions at an inverted repeat 1 motif in both groups, but also clustered within 1 kilobase of transcription start sites. FXR-binding sites were detected near previously unknown target genes with novel functions, including diverse cellular signaling pathways, apoptosis, autophagy, hypoxia, inflammation, RNA processing, metabolism of amino acids, and transcriptional regulators. Further analyses of randomly selected genes from both healthy and obese mice suggested that more FXR-binding sites are likely functionally inactive in obesity. Surprisingly, occupancies of FXR, retinoid X receptor alpha, RNA polymerase II, and epigenetic gene activation and repression histone marks, and messenger RNA levels of genes examined, suggested that direct gene repression by agonist-activated FXR is common. CONCLUSION: Comparison of genomic FXR-binding sites in healthy and obese mice suggested that FXR transcriptional signaling is altered in dietary obese mice, which may underlie aberrant metabolism and liver function in obesity.
UNLABELLED: The nuclear bile acid receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), is an important transcriptional regulator of liver metabolism. Despite recent advances in understanding its functions, how FXR regulates genomic targets and whether the transcriptional regulation by FXR is altered in obesity remain largely unknown. Here, we analyzed hepatic genome-wide binding sites of FXR in healthy and dietary obesemice by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis. A total of 15,263 and 5,272 FXR binding sites were identified in livers of healthy and obesemice, respectively, after a short 1-hour treatment with the synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064. Of these sites, 7,440 and 2,344 were detected uniquely in healthy and obesemice. FXR-binding sites were localized mostly in intergenic and intron regions at an inverted repeat 1 motif in both groups, but also clustered within 1 kilobase of transcription start sites. FXR-binding sites were detected near previously unknown target genes with novel functions, including diverse cellular signaling pathways, apoptosis, autophagy, hypoxia, inflammation, RNA processing, metabolism of amino acids, and transcriptional regulators. Further analyses of randomly selected genes from both healthy and obesemice suggested that more FXR-binding sites are likely functionally inactive in obesity. Surprisingly, occupancies of FXR, retinoid X receptor alpha, RNA polymerase II, and epigenetic gene activation and repression histone marks, and messenger RNA levels of genes examined, suggested that direct gene repression by agonist-activated FXR is common. CONCLUSION: Comparison of genomic FXR-binding sites in healthy and obesemice suggested that FXR transcriptional signaling is altered in dietary obesemice, which may underlie aberrant metabolism and liver function in obesity.
Authors: Florence Y Lee; Hans Lee; Melissa L Hubbert; Peter A Edwards; Yanqiao Zhang Journal: Trends Biochem Sci Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 13.807
Authors: Yanqiao Zhang; Florence Ying Lee; Gabriel Barrera; Hans Lee; Charisse Vales; Frank J Gonzalez; Timothy M Willson; Peter A Edwards Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Takeshi Inagaki; Mihwa Choi; Antonio Moschetta; Li Peng; Carolyn L Cummins; Jeffrey G McDonald; Guizhen Luo; Stacey A Jones; Bryan Goodwin; James A Richardson; Robert D Gerard; Joyce J Repa; David J Mangelsdorf; Steven A Kliewer Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: B Goodwin; S A Jones; R R Price; M A Watson; D D McKee; L B Moore; C Galardi; J G Wilson; M C Lewis; M E Roth; P R Maloney; T M Willson; S A Kliewer Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Wendong Huang; Ke Ma; Jun Zhang; Mohammed Qatanani; James Cuvillier; Jun Liu; Bingning Dong; Xiongfei Huang; David D Moore Journal: Science Date: 2006-04-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mitsuhiro Watanabe; Sander M Houten; Li Wang; Antonio Moschetta; David J Mangelsdorf; Richard A Heyman; David D Moore; Johan Auwerx Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Li Wang; Yoon-Kwang Lee; Donnie Bundman; Yunqing Han; Sundararajah Thevananther; Chang Soo Kim; Steven S Chua; Ping Wei; Richard A Heyman; Michael Karin; David D Moore Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 12.270