Literature DB >> 22278167

[Temporal changes in quality of life after prostate carcinoma].

M Perl1, A Waldmann, R Pritzkuleit, A Katalinic.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Each year more than 60,000 German men are diagnosed with prostate cancer. The incidence nearly doubled in the last 10 years due to intensified use of PSA testing for early detection. To date, either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy is recommended for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Both strategies have similar survival chances (83-94%), but show different side effects. In view of the good prognosis implications for health-related quality of life (QoL) may play an important role in the therapy decision-making process and should be discussed with patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer patients were asked twice about oncological health care and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, Version 2) as part of the OVIS study conducted in Schleswig-Holstein. The first questioning took place 16 months after the initial diagnosis and the second one at month 42. QoL was compared with German reference data. Logistic regression identified predictors for (a) low QoL at baseline (as indicated by global health status/QoL below the group median) and (b) clinically relevant detriments, defined as a difference of ≥10 points, in the chronological sequence.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer patients (n=1,345; median age at diagnosis 66 years) report a mean global QoL score that is higher than that of a healthy German reference sample (difference 6.3). In the temporal course, 56% of patients did not experience a clinically relevant change in QoL (<10 points difference). However, 20% reported a clinically relevant decrease and 24% a clinically relevant increase (≥ 10 points difference) regarding global health status/QoL. Higher age, lower social class, chemotherapy, undesired side effects and long-term complications as well as rehabilitative care predict low QoL at baseline, while progression of the disease and living in an urban surrounding as well as young age at diagnosis predict a decrease of QoL in the chronological sequence.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported QoL of prostate cancer patients depends on various personal and medical factors. Physicians should be aware of these factors and include them in the discussion about the appropriate therapy method with their patients. In general, therapists and family members have problems describing the QoL of their patients and relatives. Assessing the QoL and QoL-influencing factors with a short questionnaire seems to be feasible and may be helpful in the therapy decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278167     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2788-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  17 in total

1.  Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population.

Authors:  R Schwarz; A Hinz
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Gunnar Aus; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Vsevolod B Matveev; Hans Peter Schmid; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Quality of life in patients with skeletal metastases of prostate cancer and status prior to start of endocrine therapy: results from the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study 5.

Authors:  Morten Jønler; Ole Steen Nielsen; Mogens Groenvold; Per Olov Hedlund; Lena Damber; Hans Hedelin; Mauritz Waldén
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005

4.  Longitudinal effects of social support and adaptive coping on the emotional well-being of survivors of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric S Zhou; Frank J Penedo; Natalie E Bustillo; Catherine Benedict; Mikal Rasheed; Suzanne Lechner; Mark Soloway; Bruce R Kava; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

5.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

Authors:  D Osoba; G Rodrigues; J Myles; B Zee; J Pater
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Perceived stress mediates the effects of social support on health-related quality of life among men treated for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric S Zhou; Frank J Penedo; John E Lewis; Mikal Rasheed; Lara Traeger; Suzanne Lechner; Mark Soloway; Bruce R Kava; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Quality of life findings from a multicenter, multinational, observational study of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Parvez M Mulani; Mayer Fishman; Darryl Sleep
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; George Loewenstein; Christopher Jepson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  [Social inequality in medical rehabilitation].

Authors:  R Deck
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2008-10-17

10.  The measurement of response shift in patients with advanced prostate cancer and their partners.

Authors:  Jonathan Rees; Michael G Clarke; Dympna Waldron; Ciaran O'Boyle; Paul Ewings; Ruaraidh P MacDonagh
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  4 in total

1.  Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effect of perioperative complications and functional outcomes on health-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Björn Löppenberg; Christian von Bodman; Marko Brock; Florian Roghmann; Joachim Noldus; Rein Jüri Palisaar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  [Prostate cancer in routine healthcare: health-related quality of life after inpatient treatment].

Authors:  S Henninger; S Neusser; C Lorenz; E M Bitzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among patients with prostate cancer 6 months after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Daniel Lüdecke; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.