| Literature DB >> 22278137 |
Marion M M G Brands1, Ingrid M Frohn-Mulder, Marloes L C Hagemans, Wim C J Hop, Esmee Oussoren, Wim A Helbing, Ans T van der Ploeg.
Abstract
We determined the cardiologic features of children with MPS I, II and VI, and evaluated the effect of enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT) on cardiac disease. Twenty-four children aged 1-18 years with MPS I, II or VI were prospectively evaluated with echocardiogram and electrocardiogram from the start of enzyme-replacement therapy up to 6 years of treatment. At start of therapy, 66% had abnormal cardiac geometric features. Left-ventricular mass index (LVMI) was increased in half of the patients, due mainly to concentric hypertrophy in MPS I and II and to eccentric hypertrophy in MPS VI. Regurgitation was most severe in a subgroup of young MPS VI patients (<5 years) at the mitral valve. At baseline, all patients had abnormal valves. The ECG showed no clear rhythm or conduction abnormalities; neither, in most patients, did it reflect the hypertrophy. After ERT, the LVMI Z-score normalized in 70% of the patients who had a Z-score > 2. LVMI Z-scores decreased significantly in patients with MPS I and MPS II (p = 0.04 and p = 0.032). Despite ERT, valve regurgitation increased in 60% of the patients. We conclude that all our MPS patients have cardiac abnormalities. The most severe cardiac disease was observed in a subgroup of young MPS VI patients. While ERT had an effect on LVMI and IVSd, it apparently had little or none on valve regurgitation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22278137 PMCID: PMC3590414 DOI: 10.1007/s10545-011-9444-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis ISSN: 0141-8955 Impact factor: 4.982
Baseline clinical and cardiologic features of 24 mucopolysaccharidosis patients
| Pt | Age at baseline (yrs) | Sex | MPS type | Age at diagnosis (yrs) | IVSd start ERT | IVSd after ERT | LVIDd start ERT | LVIDd after ERT | LVPWd start ERT | LVPWd after ERT | LVMI start ERT | LVMI after ERT | Hypertrophy start ERT | E/A ratio start ERT | SF start ERT | Follow-up (weeks)** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | F | IH | 2 |
| 0.38 | 1.93 |
| -0.13 | -0.19 |
|
| Concentric | 1.30 |
| 312 |
|
| 1.3 | F | IH | 0 | 1.37 | -0.13 | -0.04 | -0.40 | 0.93 | -0.27 | -0.28 | -1.54 | 0 | 1.10 | 36 | 311 |
|
| 4.4* | M | IH | 1 |
| *** | -3.05 | *** |
|
| 1.87 | *** | 0 | 0.74 | 43 | 104 |
|
| 4.8 | M | IH | 1 |
| 1.56 | 0.93 | -0.69 |
| 0.91 |
| -0.13 | Concentric | 1.10 | 42 | 302 |
|
| 9.3† | M | IH | 1 |
|
| 0.60 | -0.58 |
|
|
|
| Concentric | 0.80 | 52 | 81 |
|
| 4.9 | M | IS | 5 |
| -0.13 | -0.07 | 0.95 |
| -0.59 |
| -0.90 | 0 | 1.30 | 41 | 93 |
|
| 2.4 | F | IS | 1 | 1.60 | 0.67 | 0.37 | 0.95 | 1.60 | 0.12 |
| 1.37 | 0 | 1.30 | 34 | 87 |
|
| 8.4 | M | IS | 5 |
| 1.55 | 1.03 | 1.13 | 1.55 | -0.79 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 0 | 1.70 | 32 | 259 |
|
| 10.8 | M | II | 3 | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.41 | -0.12 | 0.00 | 0.25 | -0.62 | -0.10 | 0 | 0.97 | 40 | 149 |
|
| 8.3 | M | II | 2 | 0.33 | 1.11 | -0.03 | -0.69 | -0.27 | 0.09 | -0.32 | -0.61 | 0 | 1.20 | 36 | 104 |
|
| 5.3 | M | II | 3 |
|
| -0.36 | 0.10 | 1.55 | 0.23 |
| 0.97 | Concentric | 1.20 | 36 | 116 |
|
| 1.0 | M | II | p.n |
| -0.56 | -0.36 | 0.30 | -0.93 | 1.00 | 0.10 | -0.03 | 0 | 1.40 | 35 | 159 |
|
| 2.3 | M | II | 2 | 1.87 | *** | 0.50 | *** | 1.33 | *** | 1.62 | *** | 0 | 1.40 | 45 | 0 |
|
| 9.5 | M | II | 6 |
| 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.57 |
| -0.23 |
| -0.23 | Concentric | 1.20 | 33 | 115 |
|
| 8 | F | VI | 8 |
| 1.56 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.75 | 1.20 | 0 | 1.20 | 45 | 79 |
|
| 2.8* | M | VI | 2 | 1.60 | -0.40 | 1.85 |
|
| -0.80 |
|
| Eccentric | 1.30 |
| 92 |
|
| 7.5 | M | VI | 7 | 1.89 | 0.42 | 0.44 | -1.57 | 1.90 | 1.67 | 1.50 | -0.47 | 0 | 1.70 | 46 | 104 |
|
| 18.3 | M | VI | 16 | 0.56 | 1.36 | -2.85 | -1.85 | 0.07 | 0.80 | -1.59 | -0.52 | 0 | 1.30 | 34 | 92 |
|
| 7.6 | F | VI | 7 | 0.75 | -0.33 | 0.06 | 1.28 | -1.14 | 0.27 | -0.81 | 0.36 | 0 | 1.50 | 35 | 53 |
|
| 5.9 | M | VI | 5 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.68 | 1.68 | -0.19 | 0.29 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 0 | 1.90 | 36 | 52 |
|
| 1.9 | F | VI | 1 | 1.12 | -0.67 |
|
| 0.80 | -0.67 |
| 1.24 | Eccentric | 2.00 |
| 48 |
|
| 5.3* | M | VI | 5 |
| 0,67 |
| 1.61 | 0.47 | 0.82 |
| 1.91 | 0 | 1.80 | 32 | 154 |
|
| 2.3 | M | VI | 2 | 1.47 | *** | 1.85 | *** | 0.80 |
|
| *** | 0 | 0.81 | 34 | 0 |
|
| 6.6* | F | VI | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *** | Eccentric | 1.70 | 36 | 144 |
M = Male F = Female; IVSd = interventricular septum dimension at diastole; LVIDd = left-ventricular internal dimension at diastole; LVPWd = left-ventricular posterior wall diameter at diastole; LVMI = left-ventricular mass index; SF = shortening fraction; p.n. = prenatal diagnostic procedure. 0 = absent. Abnormal values are printed in bold
*first echocardiogram of these patients was inoperable due to uncooperative behaviour. The echocardiogram of patient number 3 was made at 26 weeks of ERT; that of patient number 16 was made at 12 weeks of ERT; that of patient number 24 was made 20 weeks before ERT; and that of patient number 22 at 27 weeks before ERT
**the follow-up time was identical to the period that the patients were treated with ERT
***No follow-up echocardiogram available due to short follow-up time, behavioural problems or co-intervention bias
Fig. 1a and b: Z-score for interventricular septum diameter in diastole (IVSd) and left-ventricular mass index (LVMI) in the different types of MPS. The dotted line represents the upper limit of the normal range (=2). One patient (number 24) fell outside the axis range because she had an LVMI of 26.4 grams/m2
Baseline characteristics on electrocardiography in 24 MPS patients. MPS I (H/S) = MPS I Hurler and MPS I Scheie patients. Bpm = beats per minute
| Baseline overall | MPS I (H/S) | MPS II | MPS VI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG data | ||||
| Rhythm | ||||
| Sinus | 24 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 10 (100%) |
| Sinus tachycardia | 1 (4%) | 1 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 107 [78-155] | 120 [100-155] | 118 [80-150] | 93 [78-125] |
| PR interval (ms) | 140 [110,180] | 130 [120,150] | 145 [110,180] | 140 [120,180] |
| Prolonged PR | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (10%) |
| QRS duration (ms) | 80 [70,100] | 80 [70,80] | 80 [80-00] | 80 [70,100] |
| Prolonged QRS | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (%) | 1 (10%) |
| QTc interval (ms) | 415 [378,453] | 402 [390, 417] | 440 [412,453] | 422 [378, 441] |
| Prolonged QTc | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Incomplete bundle branch block | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17 %) | 1 (10%) |
| Left fascicular block | 2 | 1 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (10%) |
| Left atrial enlargement | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17 %) | 1 (10%) |
| Right-ventricular hypertrophy | 1 (4%) | 1 (13 %) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Left-ventricular hypertrophy | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (10%) |
| Repolarisation disorder | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | 1 (10%) |
Fig. 2Regression lines of patients with significant improvement in left-ventricular mass index (LVMI). Z-score LVMI = Z-score of the left-ventricular mass index. ● = patient number one (p = 0.015); ▲ = patient number four (p = 0.002); ○ = patient number 21 (p = 0.009); □ = patient number 22 (p = 0.043)