Literature DB >> 22277895

Impact of anemia on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting.

Catalin Toma1, Firas Zahr, Diego Moguilanski, Sheree Grate, Roy W Semaan, Nicole Lemieux, Joon S Lee, Andrea Cortese-Hassett, Suresh Mulukutla, Sunil V Rao, Oscar C Marroquin.   

Abstract

High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) on clopidogrel is a predictor of recurrent ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Significant intraindividual variability in platelet aggregation on repeat testing has been reported. To understand factors contributing to the variability in platelet aggregation testing, we examined clinical and laboratory elements linked to HRPR in 255 consecutive patients tested ≥12 hours after PCI using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate 5 μmol/L and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VNP2Y12; Accumetrics). HRPR was defined as >46% residual aggregation for LTA and >236 P2Y12 response units (PRUs) for VNP2Y12. On multivariate analysis the only variable independently associated with HRPR with both LTA and VNP2Y12 was laboratory-defined anemia. Prevalences of HRPR by LTA were 34.3% in anemic patients, 15.6% in patients with normal hemoglobin levels, and 59.8% versus 25.9% by VNP2Y12 (p <0.005 for the 2 comparisons). In a subgroup of 50 patients, testing was done before and after the clopidogrel loading dose. At baseline there were no differences in platelet aggregation with either assay; however, absolute decrease in reactivity after the clopidogrel load was significantly less in anemic patients compared to patients with normal hemoglobin (change in residual aggregation by LTA 15.8 ± 5.8% vs 28.8 ± 3.2%, p <0.05; change in PRU by VNP2Y12 56.5 ± 35.5 vs 145.0 ± 14.2 PRUs, p <0.05, respectively). In conclusion, anemia is an important contributor to apparent HRPR on clopidogrel and may explain some of the intraindividual variability of platelet aggregation testing.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22277895     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Platelet-function testing in patients undergoing neurovascular procedures: caught between a rock and a hard place.

Authors:  J Comin; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Platelet Abnormalities in CKD and Their Implications for Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Constance C F M J Baaten; Jonas R Schröer; Jürgen Floege; Nikolaus Marx; Joachim Jankowski; Martin Berger; Heidi Noels
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Different influences of hematocrit on the results of two Point-Of-Care platelet function tests, the VerifyNow assay and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry.

Authors:  Yun Gi Kim; Jung-Won Suh; Jin Joo Park; Il-Young Oh; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Young-Seok Cho; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genotyping of six clopidogrel-metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms has a minor role in the assessment of platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  María Henar García-Lagunar; Luciano Consuegra-Sánchez; Pablo Conesa-Zamora; Javier Ruiz-Cosano; Federico Soria-Arcos; Luis García de Guadiana; Pedro Cano Vivar; Juan Antonio Castillo-Moreno; Antonio Melgarejo-Moreno
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Decreased platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel correlates with CYP2C19 and PON1 polymorphisms in atherosclerotic patients.

Authors:  J F M Marchini; M R Pinto; G C Novaes; A V Badran; R B Pavão; G L Figueiredo; I M Lago; M O Lima-Filho; D C Lemos; M Tonani; C M Antloga; L Oliveira; J C Lorenzi; J A Marin-Neto
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Application of Auxiliary VerifyNow Point-of-Care Assays to Assess the Pharmacodynamics of RUC-4, a Novel αIIbβ3 Receptor Antagonist.

Authors:  Ohad S Bentur; Jihong Li; Caroline S Jiang; Linda H Martin; Dean J Kereiakes; Barry S Coller
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2021-09-28

7.  A phase 1 study of prasugrel in patients with sickle cell disease: pharmacokinetics and effects on ex vivo platelet reactivity.

Authors:  Joseph A Jakubowski; Chunmei Zhou; David S Small; Kenneth J Winters; D Richard Lachno; Andrew L Frelinger; Jo Howard; Timothy G Mant; Stipo Jurcevic; Christopher D Payne
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Impact of anaemia on clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the AFCAS registry.

Authors:  Marja Puurunen; Tuomas Kiviniemi; Wail Nammas; Axel Schlitt; Andrea Rubboli; Kai Nyman; Pasi Karjalainen; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Y H Lip; Juhani K E Airaksinen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.