Literature DB >> 22276596

Fractured zirconia implants and related implant designs: scanning electron microscopy analysis.

Reham B Osman1, Sunyoung Ma, Warwick Duncan, Rohana K De Silva, Allauddin Siddiqi, Michael V Swain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Two fractured one-piece experimental (commercially unavailable) zirconia implants were analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis to identify failure origins and aid in understanding the failure mechanisms. Modifications to the zirconia implant design are suggested to minimize such fracture incidences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two zirconia implants fractured during the final torquing in the maxillary ridge using the prescribed hand torque wrench. The implants were subsequently retrieved and prepared for optical and SEM evaluation. Critical attention was given to the fractography (crack morphology) of the fractured implants to identify the fracture origin.
RESULTS: Events related to initiation and propagation of the crack front could be detected from the morphology of the fractured surfaces. Unfavorable torque and bending forces applied on the implant during surgical placement and the inherent flaws in the material may have resulted in crack initiation and implant failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Caution must be exercised when placing zirconia implants in dense bone sites. Modification of surgical protocols for the intended implant site may be necessary. Improvement in design features specific to zirconia implants, and strict quality control during manufacture is essential to minimize the likelihood of fracture.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22276596     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02411.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  The osteoinduction of RGD and Mg ion functionalized bioactive zirconia coating.

Authors:  Zhengfei Huang; Zhifeng Wang; Chuanhua Li; Ning Zhou; Fei Liu; Jing Lan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia.

Authors:  Reham B Osman; Michael V Swain
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Zirconia versus Titanium Implants: 8-Year Follow-Up in a Patient Cohort Contrasted with Histological Evidence from a Preclinical Animal Model.

Authors:  Warwick J Duncan; Sunyoung Ma; Allauddin Siddiqi; Reham B Osman
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Spontaneous fracture of cranioplastic titanium implants without head trauma in an adult: A case report.

Authors:  Ying Jiang; Yun-Kun Wang; Ming-Kun Yu
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants.

Authors:  B Beger; H Goetz; M Morlock; E Schiegnitz; B Al-Nawas
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.