Literature DB >> 22276532

Identifying heterogeneity in rates of morphological evolution: discrete character change in the evolution of lungfish (Sarcopterygii; Dipnoi).

Graeme T Lloyd1, Steve C Wang, Stephen L Brusatte.   

Abstract

Quantifying rates of morphological evolution is important in many macroevolutionary studies, and critical when assessing possible adaptive radiations and episodes of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record. However, studies of morphological rates of change have lagged behind those on taxonomic diversification, and most authors have focused on continuous characters and quantifying patterns of morphological rates over time. Here, we provide a phylogenetic approach, using discrete characters and three statistical tests to determine points on a cladogram (branches or entire clades) that are characterized by significantly high or low rates of change. These methods include a randomization approach that identifies branches with significantly high rates and likelihood ratio tests that pinpoint either branches or clades that have significantly higher or lower rates than the pooled rate of the remainder of the tree. As a test case for these methods, we analyze a discrete character dataset of lungfish, which have long been regarded as "living fossils" due to an apparent slowdown in rates since the Devonian. We find that morphological rates are highly heterogeneous across the phylogeny and recover a general pattern of decreasing rates along the phylogenetic backbone toward living taxa, from the Devonian until the present. Compared with previous work, we are able to report a more nuanced picture of lungfish evolution using these new methods.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22276532     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01460.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  31 in total

1.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Morphological Phylogenetics Evaluated Using Novel Evolutionary Simulations.

Authors:  Joseph N Keating; Robert S Sansom; Mark D Sutton; Christopher G Knight; Russell J Garwood
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Not-so-early bursts and the dynamic nature of morphological diversification.

Authors:  Graham J Slater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution.

Authors:  Melanie J Hopkins; Andrew B Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Massive increase in visual range preceded the origin of terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  Malcolm A MacIver; Lars Schmitz; Ugurcan Mugan; Todd D Murphey; Curtis D Mobley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The rise of the ruling reptiles and ecosystem recovery from the Permo-Triassic mass extinction.

Authors:  Martín D Ezcurra; Richard J Butler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Phylogenetic non-independence in rates of trait evolution.

Authors:  Manabu Sakamoto; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Rates of morphological evolution are heterogeneous in Early Cretaceous birds.

Authors:  Min Wang; Graeme T Lloyd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Multiple paths to morphological diversification during the origin of amniotes.

Authors:  Neil Brocklehurst; Roger J Benson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Inner ear sensory system changes as extinct crocodylomorphs transitioned from land to water.

Authors:  Julia A Schwab; Mark T Young; James M Neenan; Stig A Walsh; Lawrence M Witmer; Yanina Herrera; Ronan Allain; Christopher A Brochu; Jonah N Choiniere; James M Clark; Kathleen N Dollman; Steve Etches; Guido Fritsch; Paul M Gignac; Alexander Ruebenstahl; Sven Sachs; Alan H Turner; Patrick Vignaud; Eric W Wilberg; Xing Xu; Lindsay E Zanno; Stephen L Brusatte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.