Literature DB >> 22275398

Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.

Robert C Lacy1.   

Abstract

Breeding programs aimed at conserving genetic diversity in populations of wildlife or rare domestic breeds rely on detailed pedigree analysis for selection of breeders that will minimize the loss of alleles, reduce the accumulation of inbreeding, and maintain gene diversity. Commonly, techniques use a matrix of kinship coefficients to derive measures of genetic variation, inbreeding, and the value of individuals as breeders. Although these techniques were first developed for use on known pedigrees of diploid individuals, the concepts and methods can be extended to apply to any entity that contains genes derived from definable sources (e.g., individual parents, social groups, colonies, gene banks) via a definable mechanism of heredity (e.g., sexual reproduction between separate sexes, hermaphroditic selfing, autozygous production of homozygous or haploid offspring, cloning). Individuals with partly unknown ancestry or multiple possible parents can also be incorporated into kinship calculations, based on probabilistic assignment of parental contributions. This paper presents the algorithms used in new PMx software to extend traditional pedigree analysis techniques used for complete pedigrees of sexually reproducing, diploid species to deal with missing information due to unknown or uncertain parentage, and other breeding systems such as clones, selfing hermaphrodites, and haploid offspring or autogamy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22275398     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Roger Moraga; Liz Brown; Simone Cleland; Marc P Hoeppner; Richard F Maloney; Anne Richardson; Lyndon Slater; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

2.  The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Liz Brown; Yvette Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae; Ilina Cubrinovska; Daryl Eason; Rebecca M Gooley; Jill A Hamilton; Julie A Heath; Samantha S Hauser; Emily K Latch; Marjorie D Matocq; Anne Richardson; Jana R Wold; Carolyn J Hogg; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 6.622

3.  Pedigree analysis for the genetic management of group-living species.

Authors:  Belén Jiménez-Mena; Kristine Schad; Nick Hanna; Robert C Lacy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Relatedness coefficients in pedigrees with inbred founders.

Authors:  Magnus Dehli Vigeland
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species.

Authors:  Jordan Wood; Jonathan D Ballou; Taylor Callicrate; Jeremie B Fant; M Patrick Griffith; Andrea T Kramer; Robert C Lacy; Abby Meyer; Sara Sullivan; Kathy Traylor-Holzer; Seana K Walsh; Kayri Havens
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.560

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.